this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
224 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

37519 readers
137 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a major update towards cross-browser compatibility, Firefox users are set to enjoy the benefits of importing Chrome extensions (note this is really part of the data import/migration from an existing Chrome browser installed, just for extensions that are already supported, and not installing from the Chrome web store), thanks to a new feature unveiled by Mozilla. This is a big deal because it brings us one step closer to having more compatibility between browsers.

Mozilla has been working on making extensions easier across multiple browsers, and this new feature is currently being tested.

Best part? It’s already available to all users of the latest stable version of Firefox.

Firefox itself actually has quite a few excellent extensions that you don't find on Chromium based browsers, so I'm wondering whether Google will be responding with importing Firefox extensions into Chrome? But I'm not holding my breath at all.

See https://debugpointnews.com/firefox-chrome-extensions/

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you’re misunderstanding what this is. This is simply grabbing data from an extension installed on chrome, and putting into the firefox version of the extension. This doesn’t allow chrome extensions to run within Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, I see now it is actually more a migration option for some supported extensions, I'll see if I can update the post accordingly. The title they gave was a bit misleading.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

That's not misleading, that sites subtitle is just blatantly lying.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No they don't. They detect if an extension is installed in Chrome, and if so, automatically install the Firefox equivalent - if it exists - and migrate the data. An extension that's chrome exclusive can't be ported over. I just tested and confirmed this as well, instead I was the one misunderstanding the feature, but no. Can't import any extensions not already natively existing in Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the only sane way to implement this. Can't imagine what kind of strange compatibility issues they would run into if they try to run chrome extensions directly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Is there any alternative that does the work of making one to addons if they only exist in webstore?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, I see now it is actually more a migration option for some supported extensions, I'll see if I can update the post accordingly. The title they gave was a bit misleading.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While passkeys don’t work in Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the advantage over bitwarden/protonpass?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's passwordless login, not a password manager. It's in development and they said the earliest release would be v120.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@beta_tester @4vr bitwarden/protonpass are implementations of a password manager storing (generally) username + password combinations.
Passkeys are a cryptographic way to prove your identity to a website, after authenticating yourself (generally with PIN or biometrics) to the secure store holding the cryptographic material.

As a side note, at least BitWarden and 1password are getting support to be used *as* passkey.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago