3
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

“Negative ethics asks whether it is possible to live and be ethical, whether there is not some profound mismatch between continuing to live and behaving ethically. Negative ethics asks not how to live ethically but whether we should unconditionally go on living after deciding to be ethical human beings; whether there are permanent ethical motives for staying alive. We no longer ask how to live ethically but whether we can be ethical and continue living.”

—Julio Cabrera, Discomfort and Moral Impediment

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Antinatalism

217 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to our antinatalist discussion community, a space devoted to exploring and discussing the philosophical position of antinatalism. Here, we delve into the belief that procreation is morally wrong, focusing on the ethical, ecological, and societal aspects that surround this perspective. We encourage respectful dialogues, intellectual curiosity, and an open-minded approach towards understanding the implications and challenges of antinatalism in our world.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS