this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
17 points (90.5% liked)

Legal News

177 readers
43 users here now

International and local legal news.

Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin has permanently enjoined the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services from enforcing its private-investigator licensing requirement against anti-spam entrepreneur Jay Fink. The order declares that forcing Jay to get a license to run his business is so irrational that it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment...

Jay's business stems from California's anti-spam act, which allows individuals to sue spammers. But to sue, they have to first compile evidence. To do that, recipients often have to wade through thousands of emails. For more than a decade, Jay has offered a solution: he and his team will scour a client's junk folder and catalog the messages that likely violate the law. But last summer, Jay's job — and Californians' ability to bring spammers to justice — came to a screeching halt when the state told him he was a criminal. A regulator told Jay he needed a license to read through emails that might be used as evidence in a lawsuit. And because Jay didn't have a private investigator license, the state shut him down.

The state of California has since "agreed to jointly petition the court for an order that forever prohibits it from enforcing its licensure law against Jay," according to the article.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So, I understand the premise of needing to be licensed to be a PI.

But defining cataloguing someone's email that they voluntarily gave you for the sole purpose of doing so as "PI work that requires a license" is fucking bonkers. Good common sense ruling.