this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)

Bicycling

2064 readers
11 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
7
Which bike? Salsa Warbird CF vs Canyon Grail CF SL 7? (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey y'all! Wondering if people will share their opinions please on these two new Gravel bikes I am looking at.

First, I ride casually, on the weekends. I want to spend equal time on- and off-road; there are lots of compacted gravel and dirt roads near me I want to ride. I have a road bike now, but its 25mm wheels and its slicks don't do dirt and gravel like I want.

First, the Salsa Warbird C GRX 600 1x:
https://www.salsacycles.com/bikes/2024-warbird-c-grx-600-1x

$3300 USD MSRP but a LBS has one for $2800.

Warbird C GRX 600 is a carbon gravel bike with a few tricks you won’t find anywhere else. The frameset features our gravel race geometry, a perfect blend of stability and comfort that only comes from decades of gravel riding experience. Our Class 5™ VRS (vibration reduction system) cuts chatter — and fatigue — from rugged roads that would otherwise beat you up.

OTOH, the Canyon CF SL 7:
https://www.canyon.com/en-us/outlet-bikes/gravel-bikes/grail-cf-sl-7/3095.html

Actually a mix of GRX 600 and 800 parts and an FSA Crank.

If you need to shake up your riding routine, then gravel is the answer. The lightweight Grail CF SL 7 is a hugely versatile bike ready for all your year-round off-road adventures, and comes complete with Shimano’s GRX810 gravel groupset.

I'm leaning toward the Canyon, but would appreciate any feedback / other ideas you all have for a gravel bike in the same price range, available new in the US. Cheers!

Edited for clarity.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The canyon has a 1 1/4" (1.25") steerer tube. This will make replacing the stem more difficult because almost all other brands use 1 1/8 (1.125"). Ritchey makes a stem for 1 1/4" steerer tubes if you get the canyon and need to replace the stem.

I'm also skeptical of the integrated seatpost clamp, but that's just a gut feeling rather than personal experience.

Also consider the kind of riding you really want to be doing. Are there even rougher trails you would like to get on if your bike could handle it? If so a hardtail mountain bike is worth considering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Oh good calls on the steerer tube and the seat post. I'll keep them in mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Salsa looks like a normal no-nonsense design. Clamps, handlebars and all. The Canyon has got some too fancy for comfort things. For example I don't know what's gonna happen if the handlebars are too low for me. It doesn't look like there's much possibility for adjustment. On the Salsa I can even replace the fork if I need to for more drastic changes.

Also seconding the opinion that generally aluminum is much easier to live with than carbon. Steel can be totally great too, it adds less than a kilo to the total. For some idea - my previous cyclocross frame was aluminum and it weighed about 1.7kg in large. My current steel frame weighs 2.07kg - a Soma Double Cross. You'll have to think about rust however. Most modern steel is painted on the inside to protect against rust. I still internally washed mine with ACF-50 prior to assembly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trade you my Poseidon X for either 😅

They both look great - enjoy the ride whichever you decide on!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just looked those up and see they're under 1000usd. Do you like yours? Do you ever avoid riding some trail because you might break something? Someone else said my two ideas were overkill for my uses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I like it, but it's a complicated answer. First, I really like it as I'd been away from any kind of cycling for some years and this was one of the first bikes that had fit me for some time (not a weird size or anything, I was just riding old bikes I'd outgrown or second hand). For the price point, it was a great reintroduction.

I've had mine for a year in mid-August. I ride ~50mi/wk on a combo of paved multi use tail, gravel roads, and single track. At the moment, it's my only bike and because of that I'm also taking it places it probably shouldn't go, like rough/rocky single track. But...at the lower cost, that's something I'm more willing to do with that bike than say a $3k carbon gravel bike.

I see a lot of people out on more expensive bikes that look barely used and I'm keeping up with them just fine.

I have put some work and money into this, but nothing too outside to norm for maintenance in a year's time - standard saddle and pedal swap, tires, replaced the brake cables and re-wrapped the handle bars in the process.

I recently had a spoke break on a ride, and I think that's kind of turned my attention to wishing that there were just better components as a whole on the bike. Things like hydraulic disc vs mechanical would be nice.

However much I'd love to have a better gravel bike though, my focus is on getting a mtn bike again as I think I'm currently just treating this bike too rough. I've just found I'm really enjoying riding again and want to do it all.

If you're not sure how much you'll actually ride gravel, I'd say it's worth checking out. I believe their current line addresses some of the issues people have had with brake cables and they've moved to thru-axle as more standard, but I honestly haven't kept up with them much. It's been great for my all-around use. You just may find yourself wanting an upgrade if you get into riding gravel. But if not, at least you haven't overspent.

Hope that helps!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Idk man that canyon looks a bit unusual. Unless I'm missing something on the pictures, I don't vibe that double handlebar thing going on. The salsa looks like the more understandable bike but I think they're both pricy.

What kind of riding are you planning to do on it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Canyon is a previous year's model, on sale and luckily, in my size. Here's the current one, without the funky bars: https://www.canyon.com/en-us/gravel-bikes/performance/grail/cf-sl/grail-cf-sl-7/3575.html?dwvar_3575_pv_rahmenfarbe=R119_P01

I ride alone and with small groups, on streets and dirt paths and in one place, on real gravel. I ride about 12 - 15 MPH on average, between 10 and 50 mile routes.

I'm open to cheaper ideas too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bought my wife a used rocky mountain solo and she loves it. Also got a lot of compliments this weekend from others that tried it out. It's a lesser known brand but I have no complaints about it so far.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Gotcha, thanks