there is no way to verify they don't actually log anything
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)
Privacy
30829 readers
1293 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Eh. You can inspect the source code. Certainly there's no way to verify they haven't modified the source code but also why would they modify it to store your IP?
The source code of the frontend is unrelated to the webserver they use, which can absolutely store your IP.
To be 100% sure? Host it yourself. There is always a chance the operator violates your privacy, willing or unwillingly.
To be 100% sure? Host it yourself.
I mean for privacy, not really. Then the site in question is logging all of your activity from your personal IP, as opposed to an IP shared with others.
Self hosting doesn't limited to hosting in home. It can be a VPS, colocation, or even in your work place if the IT department is happy about it.
If it's a VPS, it's still your IP
Making it available to others as well would be the perfect solution then
It's also a great way to have your server completely overwhelmed with traffic but yeah.
I trust my folks at sdf as fellow unix hackers.
self hosting is the only way to guarantee logs arent shared.
however it also means that your server address only pulls requests for things YOU look at, not the whole pool of people using the server. imo this is a bad trade off as it would allow the services to track my browsing easily anyway.
personally I would recommend looking at libredirect with a large # of frontend instances selcted & a vpn/tor. these websites normally work without javascript, so assuming you have a privacy focused browser your IP is the only tracking metric they really have. spreading your requests out over different servers whilst using a proxy would make this really difficult to correlate as it would require that mutliple instance operators were malicious & collaborating.
Trusting is good, but.. don't trusting is better..
Self-host? Or use VPN to connect.
DIY
As another commenter said, it's not possible to verify. You'll just have to take each instance's word for it.
Instance lists for some privacy front-ends will point out additonal info, such as if each instance is using CloudFlare or not (this may or may not be useful depending on if you distrust CloudFlare), some other services (like Rimgo, a private Imgur frontend) lets the instance hoster customize the privacy policy. But once again, this is all relying on the instance host telling the truth.
Use FreeTube with VPN. But you'll have to find a VPN provider you trust, of course. Should be a bit easier.
It is just Invidious
Piped is good although it is weakened by the Google attacks. It will be back to normal after a while.
Freetube had an update I think either yesterday or the day before and that seems to have recovered now.
Freetube is invidious under the hood