Here’s a 1-minute long, AI generated* summary video, if you didn’t want to watch 27 minutes worth:
https://youtu.be/t-7mQhSZRgM?si=f8YR2CHKhVtpmj8D
*Carl is an AI
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
Here’s a 1-minute long, AI generated* summary video, if you didn’t want to watch 27 minutes worth:
https://youtu.be/t-7mQhSZRgM?si=f8YR2CHKhVtpmj8D
*Carl is an AI
Someone gave the Emacs psychiatrist a god complex
Thank god you are real acausalrobotgod, else we would have been forced to create you.
Couldn't make it through the video, but this level of argument has been hashed and rehashed over literally the past thousand years. It's in the training data out the wazoo. And yet the youtube commenters act like it's the most insightful thing they've ever heard, and not copy-pasted from a mediocre philosophy 101 textbook.
each perspective is given its best possible representation.
This was a quite nuanced debate, better than what most humans are capable of.
I feel like we are nearing to the end of the times. We humans are losing faith in ourselves… -- Hayao Miyazaki
It's probably half the training set, considering it's based on scraped web and of all the web, there is the most web of internet atheist debating. Acres and acres of such web.