MTG

1859 readers

17 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

I really wish they'd use a different method. (scryfall.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Of the 11 new printings of planeswalkers, 4 are in the Commander precons, 1 is normally collectible from the set, and the other 6 have the commander set symbol but aren't in the decks.

This means that if you wanted a chance to pull them yourself from packs, you must be opening collectors boosters as they are the only ones with a slot for commander cards.

It feels so scummy of them to not use special guest slot for cards like this. It's not the first time, and it doesn't only affect the planeswalkers. There are some rather pricy rats (marrow gnawer and Ink eyes) also secluded from standard pull tables this way.

Anyone know when this started? I noticed it a year or so back when there was a green commander set card, but no green commander deck, but I cannot recall the card or set.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They don't want to put these into special guest slots in Play Boosters for 2 reasons. Induce demand for collector boosters, and also help preserve the limited environment at least a little bit. I think it's also why they went from The List to Special Guests in general.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you want a specific card, buy that card.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahh yes, from the 1st party wotc direct sale option so you don't have to pay higer prices for a card only available in the most expensive packs /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@HexadecimalSky @morphballganon Aesthetic choices can be expensive. Sorry, that's capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

@lovestha Yes, buying bloomburrow reprints are for the aesthetic. Collector booster packs have a higer premium for the aesthetics of foils. Having to pay collector booster prices, not for foils but set cards, is annoying.

Edit: I known people who have thier eyes on the set just for fox Jace, it's capitalism but annoying they have half the point of the set on jacked up prices, the other part of capitalism is we complain it's more than we'll pay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Well yes, that's how it's done these days with these pull rates. Those cards are going to be significantly rarer than they have any right to be.

Why is Ral fine to be in the normal set but all the rest aren't? Why couldn't they just make some other set symbol for those cards that still only show up in collectors? it will be less confusing down the road.

Hell, outlaws of thunder junction had 4 separate set symbols throughout it not counting list and special guest. Two main with an elusive third doesn't seem like it'd be all that taxing.