Not enough info. I live in a place with earthquakes, typhoons, volcanoes, and tsunamis so it might be worth it. I also like to take my motorbike to the middle of nowhere sometimes and don't currently have any other device to contact anyone.
Android
DROID DOES
Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
We are Android girls*,
In our Lemmy.world.
The back is plastic,
It's fantastic.
*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.
Our Partner Communities:
Pretty stupid question since the cost is not stated, the reliability and coverage is unknown, and it might or might not require a high end phone. I don't plan to buy a pixel 9 before they are old enough to be deeply discounted, at any rate. To put it in perspective, a Moto Defy is $150+$5/mo and I haven't bought one of them. Anything I buy would have to be cheaper and at least as good.
In the PNW where lots of people spend time out in the mountains or desert miles away from anything and any service, normalizing satellite communication into regular smartphones would be excellent in an emergency. I know they have special satellite phones now but the costs are insanely expensive.
No, mobile coverage is exceptionally good in the UK.
Fucking awful in Montana. Even in cities att barely gets me data once a week. Satellite would almost be necessary in rural America
That's a shame, I get full 5g in most cities, up to 2Gbps when next to the masts, and 4G almost everywhere else populated.
Lol no.
No.
No way. Coverage on my carrier is solid everywhere I've been - even in the middle of a national park a couple of hours outside the city recently.
I like to get away, but I'm not the type to want to go to extremely remote places, hours from the nearest town in the middle of the desert or anything like that. So this is useless to me.
I'll accept it if it's free, otherwise you can keep it.
oh good, if this technology is on the horizon, I will continue to resist the urge to establish starlink service. I will wait until my android phone has this built in.
If smartphones start embedding a lora antenna and a mesh client, it won't be necessary on 90% of earth surface
Setting up a pay-as-you-go option would be rather neat
Maybe for a month if I'm on a trip to a remote location. Don't really see a use for it other than that.