this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15919 readers
10 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Consider that, whenever a critic of some woke supposition lays out the case for, say, why defunding or even abolishing the police is a terrible idea (as Neiman ably does)

anarchists

In that regard, wokeness must serve a very useful function in contemporary capitalist society, which means it will be much harder to leave behind than it may seem.

The story of how exactly it serves that function has yet to be adequately written. It probably has something to do with the immense (and immensely wealthy) “nonprofit” sector and the revolving door between large influential corporate foundations, the Democratic Party, the media, and the government. A self-reenforcing circuit that surely operates in ways similar to the military-industrial complex.

fedcobin, here is incredibly easy logic why it works the way it does in the real (capitalist) world: some out-groups are not allowed into the capitalist class. When they are allowed in - it leads to dramatic deradicalization (see civil rights movement or more recently gay rights) of demands and marginalization of radicals. It doesn't mean being normal empathetic human being to other people suffering is not leftist, christ sake.

As bad as wokeness is, what’s next could always be worse. If Foucauldian-Schmittianism wrought havoc on the Left, this “mind virus” is likely to cause even more trouble if its tenets become widely adopted on the Right. Consider that the major impulse of wokeness was a kind of reflexive pity for victims.

Yet the “victimology” mindset can go both ways. If the woke have insisted that characteristics like a person’s skin color, or their gender, or whatever else, marks them as fundamentally different in a grand metaphysical way and have made that point central to political appeals, then what happens if the Right takes up the charge by simply reversing the friend-enemy polarity? They will say to young men that their loneliness is not a function of “toxic masculinity” but instead the result of women’s claims to equality. And they will say to poor whites, who are adrift and frustrated, that they don’t need to “abolish ‘whiteness’” — instead, they should embrace it. We already see this beginning to happen — a reversal of the Left’s hard-fought victory in the civil rights era.

We should be worried about the fact that the woke paved the way for a hard right in more ways than one. Not only has particularly outlandish woke rhetoric offered right-wingers a set of increasingly easier political layups, their mocking rejection of patient democratic persuasion offers them a playbook for how to do political combat in an age of ideological nihilism.

pepe-silvia recent compactmag implosion is the reason pepe-silvia

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"wokeness" is a buzzword used by the right, if you take the concept seriously, you're a either a fool or a tool

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let me write a long boring screed where I randomly reference 18th and 19th century philosophers to make my writing "flow", all so I can justify ignoring black and queer people. I am very far left.

Why does this shit get published?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

pepe-silvia recent compactmag implosion is the reason pepe-silvia fedcobin accepting redbrown refugees

idfk disgost

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yet the “victimology” mindset can go both ways. If the woke have insisted that characteristics like a person’s skin color, or their gender, or whatever else, marks them as fundamentally different in a grand metaphysical way and have made that point central to political appeals, then what happens if the Right takes up the charge by simply reversing the friend-enemy polarity? They will say to young men that their loneliness is not a function of “toxic masculinity” but instead the result of women’s claims to equality. And they will say to poor whites, who are adrift and frustrated, that they don’t need to “abolish ‘whiteness’” — instead, they should embrace it. We already see this beginning to happen — a reversal of the Left’s hard-fought victory in the civil rights era.

How can someone be this stupid? THEY WERE ALREADY FUCKING DOING THIS DECADES AGO. Does this dumbfuck actually think that racism or sexism were solved problems?

Jesus fucking christ who would give the okay to publish this trash instead of just adding the author to a blacklist?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If this can get published in jacobin, so can bmf thinking-about-it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Unlikely; bmf usually had good points and just presented them in a bizarre and disjointed way.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Anyone who says “woke” unironically during political discourse are to be treated as children who yap at the adult table

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Are they seriously comparing the nonprofit industrial complex to MIC? It's like 3 orders of magnitude smaller, while doing more good for the population and acting as a (miniscule) jobs program.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Contributors

Dustin Guastella is director of operations for Teamsters Local 623 in Philadelphia.

So first the leader dickhead goes to the RNC then this shit? I'm getting real fucking sick of Teamsters really fucking fast.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

They're a blue collar union in amerikkka, probably a majority of their members are Republicans, there's nothing to be be surprised about here

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

more real question though, would foucault be a gooner?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He would identify the discourse that produced the identity of gooner and the way that category was embedded in existing power relations

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Gooning is an inverse panopticon

In the middle ages gooners were considered one of the natural states of man and occupied a specialized place at the margins of society, but were not excluded from it

That's all I got

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

"woke" is being used the same way "DEI" is being used. It just means "thing I don't like/perceive as being leftist".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Amazing. Every paragraph more puzzling than the last. So many head scratchers. So much ink spilled giving form and detail to a deliberately amorphous right wing concept, inventing the most tortured and deranged particulars for it, and then attributing that abomination to the left. Or liberals? Or the ruling class? All of the above I guess? Rocks in this person’s head.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Elite capture is a thing but holy i-love-not-thinking

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Social democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism. Fedcobin is a perfect example of that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yet another think piece about woke that never defines woke

Only part I somewhat agree with is

One reason it’s so hard to make sense of the thing is that defenders of wokeness almost never substantially engage with critics like Neiman. Indeed, many of today’s woke sympathizers deny that wokeness is, or ever was, an identifiable set of influential ideas. Wokeness takes its self-conception as natural. Its advocates do not argue for their position, they merely mock.

I've run across enough Epic Western Anarchists online to know that a lot of people do use mockery to cover for a hollow understanding. Not to be a "debate me" person but if your sarcastic mockery is hard-countered with facts you don't get to just double down on mockery.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Mockery has its uses, but it's not the end-all-be-all communication method a lot of people seem to think it is. It's fun and entertaining, though, so it gets defended more than it should.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Legend of Zelda: Twilight Wokecess

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fisher published Vampire's Castle ten years ago, the normal whites thesis saw the best midterm results in modern history, Kanye debuted at number one. Jacobin is a lagging indicator-- the scolds are through 😤