this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
115 points (99.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8492 readers
354 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Its amazing to watch Intel self destruct. For so long they were the king, and AMD was a distant second. Now AMD is the undisputed king.

Anyone know how User Bench Marks is taking this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what historical data would have to do with a rapidly evolving story.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In the last 5 years Intel has had near 70% marketshare

That would not put AMD in the position of undisputed king

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still don't see what historical data has to do with the fact that Intel is CURRENTLY self-destructing, while AMD's performance has left it in a position of best performance for the dollar, without continual crashing.

I don't find an argument of "well, 5 years ago" very convincing when I'm talking about the current position

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“The last 5 years” includes all the years in that time period

Intel currently has a market lead

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I am curious how you think "% of CPUs world wide" would change in one month so quickly, especially while the self destruction is so recent...

Like, you are in an article about how server users are currently finding 50%-100% of intel CPU's are failing, and saying "well, this historical data says..."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AMD has been better the whole Ryzen life-span

But it’s irrelevant

I am curious how you think “% of CPUs world wide”

It was sales in the year, but you’re the one claiming they’re the King. At least now you realize how foolish your statement was

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

All I'm realizing is you are one hell of a pedant, and I was a fool to engage with you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

You’ll come around

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AMD just delayed their 9000 series too, the Intel issues have caused them to be more careful, thanks Intel!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if it prevents the sort of issues that Intel's chips are hitting, that would be a good thing for users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

maybe it was not a sarcastic "thanks".

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Ngl 50% is kinda high...