I mean... You have to explicitly hit "open", and it requires you to do so? This is like saying email has a vulnerability because it lets* me open files sent there?
I get what they are after, but this is a stretch.
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)
Cybersecurity
5379 readers
159 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Notable mention to [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I guess preferably they'd just be saved and/or opened in a text editor, rather than ran on your computer
Starts getting into demarcation land at that point, because the OS defines what files are opened in which program. Just saving makes sense as a compromise though!
Right, but they could define a special behaviour so it doesn't immediately run a script you click on. It is kinda your fault if you get got by this, but it would be a bit more secure with mitigations in place.
Haha jokes on them, it won't even let me install their apps on Windows