this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
81 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

1163 readers
359 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Google Chrome is now encouraging uBlock Origin users who have updated to the latest version to switch to other ad blockers before Manifest v2 extensions are disabled.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 month ago

Google Chrome reminds uBlock Origin users to switch to Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Holds hole saw menacingly to own boat

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s never been a better time to switch to Firefox, just saying.

[–] possiblylinux127 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even better! I'm using Floorp atm.

[–] possiblylinux127 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Sorry. Well it works well for me. I Iike the interface. The developer did make everything open source again. I believe it's a fine choice. And always better than Mozilla Firefox at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Google reminds people to disable Google Chrome

[–] possiblylinux127 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Firefox and Librewolf have problems. However, they are somehow better than Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't forget other alternatives as well like Floorp and Waterfox.

[–] possiblylinux127 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not as private and Floorp includes proprietary components. I am not sure about waterfox.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Floorp includes proprietary components

That's out of date, they made everything open-source again recently as announced on their subreddit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That is not true indeed. As Onihikage pointed out the developer released all source code.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Luckily the one webapp that I have to use chrome for doesn't even have ads or tracking on it. I use Firefox for everything else, so uBlock will continue working fine for me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a hypothetical question on this.

If say, I had a crypto wallet via extension in chrome.

And unlock origin goes away.

I then visit a site I used to visit where pop ups were blocked

Malware gets installed. Crypto wallet gets drained.

Can I sue Google ?

I ask because I do have a tiny wallet that is via extension. Curious how someone with a much larger one on there would go...

[–] BrikoX 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Terms of service you agreed to when installing it protects them from all liability.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While I agree.

Part of me thinks it's like "we removed the seatbelts from the rollercoaster. It's now your responsibility to hold on"...

[–] BrikoX 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's why laws that mandate safety are important. Seatbelts on rollercoasters are mandatory, while tech companies can pretty much put anything in terms of service since they have enough of the politicians in their pocket that nobody outlaws it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Don't think Google would be at fault there, at most it would be the fault of the website that served you the ad or the service that website used to serve you the ad. (Which could be Google but they wouldn't be at fault for not letting you block ads, they would be at fault for serving you a malicious ad)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Excellent news. Google needs to think up more creative ways to punish people for using Chrome.