this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
457 points (98.3% liked)

Comic Strips

11976 readers
1900 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The biggest advantage of bows in a gun setting would be stealth, can't shoot what you don't know is there. Makes the superhero stuff a bit difficult, though.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

But what if you put a boxing glove on your arrow? Surely that would help

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also going through kevlar body armor with ease.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not stab-resitant armour, though. They can easily swap one out with the other.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Or put on a jean jacket over the kevlar.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd still go with a repeating crossbow though, more power while being easier and faster to use.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

According to un-sourced Archery Heaven, regular crossbows are as loud as a lawnmower, nevermind repeating. Not quite the stealth you might be looking for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bowstring twang is going to be loud no matter what at high draw weights. A high draw weight recuve would be loud too.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, that's what the linked articles' conclusion was. But 80dB vs 120dB is a huge difference, jackhammer compared to a dishwasher. Anyway, I'm out of my depth, I shot a bow last 30 years ago. And never as a stealthy assassin nor archery-based superhero.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

TIL the movies lied to me! I vividly remember John Rambo stealth-killing a camp of enemy fighters with a bow.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"easier to use" shouldn't really matter for Particularly-Good-At-Archery-Man. It's not like a bow is a particularly slow weapon, either (medieval archers were probably doing about 10 shots per minute), and you don't really need the additional power of crossbows - medieval war bows were able to kill armored knights, they were pretty much only limited by the archer's strength. Whether you need high power pretty much depends on the setting - if you're mostly fighting against human thugs who maybe wear a protective vest you don't need extremely high draw strength. If the setting is more fantastical, why WOULDN'T "particularly good at archery" include absurdly strong muscles that make the additional power of crossbows unnecessary?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So many heroes only attach blue-collar crime, and never tackle white-collar crime. It's classicist.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So many heroes only attach blue-collar crime, and never tackle white-collar crime.

Sooo... no different than the police, then.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Cue police with punisher badges

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s classicist.

Crimen Omnia Ex Se Nata Vitiate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Being a sneaky archer is incompatible with hero monologues.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

love that one.