A testament to the Deck's optimization or Starfield's? Either way, I've definitely experienced supposedly "verified" games on Deck that are middling performers at best. Hopefully this one means 40+ fps on medium settings minimum.
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
42 points (97.7% liked)
Starfield
2874 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!
- Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)
Helpful links:
Spoiler policy:
- No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
- Add
[Spoilers]to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post. - Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
- Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!
Post & comment spoiler syntax:
<spoiler here>
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Hard to say given the minimum requirements for the game are much higher than the steam deck (the RX 5700 is a desktop 36 CU RDNA1 gpu, the steamdeck uses an 8 CU RDNA2 igpu). The thing is, theres no standardization of what minimum requirement means, settings, frametarget and resolution wise, hence why minimum requirements are usually not that helpful.
Hoo boy, if it's actually as good as they're saying it's gonna be, I'm not gonna be able to not play it constantly now.
I hope this is true, because I'm not sure if my PC is up to the task. I do at least have Steam Deck as a backup.