this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

Linux for Leftists

1144 readers
1 users here now

A Community for all leftists wanting to join and being part of a community that talks about Linux, Unix and the Free Software Community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everything just feels way more complicated than it needs to be.

I tried installing Openshot (a video editor) but I couldn't figure out how to fix the error it spits out when I try to emerge it.

I will now try out Arch and hope I don't need a master's degree to install packages.

Edit: Gentoo isn't the first distro I've tried, I've been daily driving Debian for more than a year and just wanted to try it out since I heard good things about it. And also I didn't really need to use Openshot, I just wanted some video editor and arbitrarily chose to install that one.

Also I guess I will just stick with Debian since apparently Arch is also complicated.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Arch isn't any easier than Gentoo. If you're newer to Linux and looking for something that 'just works' I'd stick with something Debian based like Ubuntu, Elementary, Mint, or PopOS

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

akhtchually arch is a little easier than gentoo. gentoo is fully source-based, while arch is binary first. gentoo has use flags, while arch comes preoccupied with flags.

albeit both distros cater to a little more experienced users, there's that. i also think a more user-friendly distro would be a better start. at least the ones where you can get a working environment by just using a live installer. mint IS a good alternative.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No way! 😱

I'll take a look at these distros, though I'm not really too much of a beginner anymore.

I actually come from Debian, but I hopped distros in hopes of finding an even better distro.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotcha! Enjoy your hopping then - just didn't want someone to try out Linux for the first time on hard mode and give up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeap, all new comers to linux should first try Gentoo, if it fails, then try LFS. After that, KISS linux should be a breeze

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean... It doesn't have to be a competition, does it?

Some people just want a stable system to work on. I kind of want to leave Ubuntu, I like mint and popos, but. They don't always work out of the box like Ubuntu does for me. So I just change the dm to emulate other distros and it feels good enough.

Am I doing it wrong?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

openshot on debian must be about 3 years behind arch

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I installed Gentoo back when I was just starting out with Linux (I got the release from the DVD on the front of a magazine, if you want an idea of how long ago this was!). I learned a tonne about Linux that has stuck with me to this day, but then promptly wiped the drive and installed something that I actually wanted to use day-to-day hahaha.

So yeah, it happens!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yep that's Gentoo for ya.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an every-day Gentoo user, there is little reason to use Gentoo unless you have specific, niche configuration requirements. For instance, if you need to use a very specific version of a piece of software with very specific build-time parameters.

Where Gentoo shines is the ability to combine some old packages with some bleeding edge ones. If I, for some reason, want to run PostgreSQL 10 (released 2017) alongside Node.js 20 (released 2023), it is a thing I can do. This is not possible on most other distros - at least, not without side-stepping the package manager and compiling a bunch of things yourself.

I've used Gentoo several times over the years, and what ultimately made me switch back was Docker's reliance on iptables. I was using Fedora at the time, which had switched to nftables. (I don't think this is as much of an issue now, but it was a few years back).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

In my experience, Gentoo is in many ways easier than Arch. Portage is a much better package manager, and getting something to break (even if using unstable) is really hard. Never heard of OpenShot, but I would take a look if there are some bugs related to it that are relevant. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-video%2Fopenshot

In my experience, whilst Arch is also an excellent distro it is much easier to mess something up, or for pacman to mess something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've found Gentoo kinda frustrating too, having installed it on my laptop just to try it out as a habitual Arch user. Source packages mean updates take a lot longer and will also destroy my battery if I'm not plugged in, there seem to be fewer packages than on Arch, the installation wasn't exactly 100% smooth, etc. I can definitely appreciate Gentoo, but it really seems like it's just not for me. My guess will be that you'll find Arch a bit easier to work with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think there is a point in using gentoo unless you have a specific need for what makes it unique.

Debian is a great choice imo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

if you want to try something like Gentoo as a Debian user, it should probably be in a VM or on a second physical computer until you get used to it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Gentoo is not difficult. Been using it for the last year

load more comments
view more: next ›