this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
183 points (100.0% liked)

News

22839 readers
3811 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While there is water frozen at the Martian poles and evidence of vapour in the atmosphere, this is the first time liquid water has been found on the planet

The findings are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

By measuring how fast seismic waves travel, scientists have worked out what material they are most likely to be moving through. 

"These are actually the same techniques we use to prospect for water on Earth, or to look for oil and gas," explained Prof Michael Manga, from the University of California, Berkeley, who was involved in the research. 

The analysis revealed reservoirs of water at depths of about six to 12 miles (10 to 20km) in the Martian crust.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is how we foot the bill to settle mars. Nestle.

If it's stripping a far away land of its natural resources, it's gotta be Nestle.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

monkeys paw curls

Nestle begins their plan to genocide the subterranean civilization of Mars

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They almost won the war against the earth subterranean civilization already but nobody cares about it

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (3 children)

10 to 20km? That is probably unreachable, at least for a long time.

The deepest hole drilled on Earth is the Kola Superdeep Borehole which reached 12.2km, requiring almost 20 years of operation and tons of heavy equipment.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They did also say in the article that the rover could only measure straight down from its position, so maybe not all of the water is so deep.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, that's a good point. If we found one aquifer there might well be others, and they could be at any depth.

Of course the problem is, we'll need to place this kind of seismic sensor around the whole planet...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I’m no astroseismologist but I feel like I’ve heard of sensors like this being on satellites like to investigate glaciers etc. though maybe 10km of rock isn’t so easily penetrated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I just want to say thank you for actually having someone to say other than some stupid joke to try to get fake Internet points.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Find Water on Mars

I can hear your comment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah... I'm currently excessively play Surviving Mars right now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Achievement hunting here

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

The analysis revealed reservoirs of water at depths of about six to 12 miles (10 to 20km) in the Martian crust.

Hollow Earthers were so close, only one planet off! Turns out it was waterlogged Mars after all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Edit: I guess some people aren't Doctor Who fans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Everyone talking about extraction seems to be missing one important thing: liquid water invites the possibility of life.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for BBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS):

MBFC: Pro-Science - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2409983121
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxl849j77ko
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support