this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
1 points (66.7% liked)

Apple

17241 readers
190 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I was really thinking that EyeSight would be the first thing to be touchbarred but it looks like I might be wrong.

Anyway, we got plenty of time before the headset's release. Original iPhone was announced at $1000 but rapidly saw its price go down to $500. Let's hope for the best

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Apple Vision S Lite Mini

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I hope by "low resolution screens" it just means lower resolution than the pro version.

Because personally, I'm tired of looking at my shitty low res screen on my Quest 2. It's so blurry to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hence the "Pro" designation - it was 100% obvious that one was coming. The real question is what will Apple compromise to get a lower cost Vision to the masses?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think one of the big differences will be with the speakers. If they make the standard model require AirPods, they can eliminate speakers entirely and save significantly on cost.

Another possibility is moving from metal to plastic for the frame design. This saves on cost and weight. They could also take out the 3D camera.

I strongly believe they won't compromise on the display resolution or the EyeSight feature, though it's possible they'll be able to fake the lenticular effect using software and opt for a simpler outward-facing display.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They won't take anything away. Or at least, they won't compromise on the key things that make it good.

Right now they call it "pro" and keep the price high for early adopters and tech enthusiasts who will pay it.

Then they release the regular version.... alongside "Pro 2".

Pro 2 gets some fancy new features, while the regular version (and cheaper version) hits much of the same performance as the Pro 1 but for a more reasonable price.

So everyone is happy: early adopters got to have Pro 1 while everyone else had nothing, people who waited get a cheaper model that is just as good as this version, and enthusiasts who have $ to spend get to upgrade to a Pro 2 that is even better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They should totally remove the stupid OLED screen on the outside. That would probably save them ~$300 USD for basically zero loss in functionality.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had this same conversation with my wife. Vision Pro is the "throw it all at the wall and see what sticks" model with all of the bells and whistles. If they find stuff is over-built or not utilized, they'll target those areas for future cost savings.

For example, right now (without having used it), I'm skeptical if the finger-tap/pinch movements with their specialized tracking and cameras is more valuable than a more economical input method.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the beta test that people will pay $3500 for to be beta testers for Apple and claim "first!" status. Then they'll come out with a $1000 to $1500 "regular person" model.

load more comments
view more: next ›