this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
892 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58134 readers
4055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

get newpipe and ublock origin if you want to screw with google:

https://newpipe.net/

https://ublockorigin.com/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Alt nominations:
Grayjay (Android)
Freetube (PC)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Is this the reason why SmartTubeNext keeps breaking on my TV? The updates come pretty quickly but it's getting annoying cause my $1800 OLED has the processing power of a $50 Chinese Android phone and thus takes forever to install updates.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (10 children)

We need to slowdown YouTube and get an alternative that is viable for people and creators. The problem in this case is creators and brands, almost no creators would continue doing videos if there's no money at the end

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There is the PeerTube network, which works like Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is one the best YouTube alternative but needs to be adopt massively

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

Start using it and ask content creators to also put their content on there.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

The problem with money being involved is it's an invitation to spam crap everywhere.

One of my relatives has recently taken up "AI travel videos" and "AI cute videos" as a "hobby". No doubt based on the first thing that came up when I searched for those things, a video titled "make $10,000 a month spamming up YouTube with your AI slop".

Oh, and it needs you to buy the AI slop generating tools that they happen to sell. How convenient!

I mean, this also happened with broadcast TV, where we suddenly went from like 4 channels filled with programs and things competing for space, to 200 channels, where the rush was on to fill the gaps between the adverts as cheaply as possible with reality show tat. And that's all YouTube is now.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other problem is storage and bandwidth.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The solution is decentralization of the web

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

It's subscription based, but Nebula is creator owned I believe. Sucks though that everything free gets acquired by some extractive company.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Odysee is actually doing amazing. The interface is great and the speed is even better than Youtube at the moment.

They are however swithing their core structure from one blockchain powered storage model to another one, so at the moment it's a bit guesswork and could possibly turn out very bad. (ArWeave bought them...)

Regarding the far right content on the platform; yes, there is a bit of it, but I have only once come across it, and I was actually browsing some categories relating to politics. So in normal usage, following content creators and checking what Odysee is featuring, you'll not come across them. But even if you do, Odysee's block/mute functionality works better than the one on YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Nah a little alt right content is entirely too much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Freedom of speech for me but not for thee

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

See that's the cute thing.They can have their free speech right there, but freedom also means the for most people obvious choice not to associate with nazis and other similiar troglodytes.

And as you said yourself, it already seems to be a popular hole for said miscreants, so why even bother with it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

As I said, you don't even notice them except if you look for them.

Odysee also has very good block/muting, much better than that of YouTube.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Something community owned and a non-profit would be good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They're already halfway there /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This sux big time, been using grayjay and it seems to be working alright thus far

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

That's because it's all local to your device.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other day someone on lemmy kept trying to tell me that if google wanted to shut down ad blocking they would. But they don't, so it's ok.

Lol, spawn me that person plz.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

AdBlocking is 100% OK, that part is correct for sure. Ad networks (including Google's) routinely serve up scams and malware: It is foolish not to use a browser with a fully functional ad blocker at this point (i.e. avoid Chrome, use Firefox with uBlock origin).

As for whether Google approves: Fuck Google! They have been serving up malware and scams in their ads. Their opinion should be irrelevant if you have any interest in protecting yourself, they have repeatedly proven they cannot and should not be trusted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

If Google takes money to host an ad that's malware, they should be able to be prosecuted for it.

This is different than simply hosting community content that they can't reasonably moderate. They're being given money to distribute these ads, so they can afford to moderate them.

Which should be easy anyway. Ads shouldn't be able to install third-party shit from the advertisers on user computers. Google can easily restrict what can be included on an ad package.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Yes at this point why would any person would care what Google thinks? Google can go fuck themselves.

[–] [email protected] 145 points 2 days ago (15 children)

I've seen the effects on invidious these past days. 8 in 10 instances have been broken. Google is putting some serious work into shutting alternate frontends down. Shows you how much of a dent they're putting in the bottom line.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shows you how much of a dent they’re putting in the bottom line.

Or how desperate google execs are to get even the tiniest bump in revenue.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

LINE MUST GO UP AT ALL TIMES

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm a YouTube creator, part of the partner program, and I also manually upload to TILvids. The videos I make generate about $100-$300 a year through the partner program, so I'm not a professional by any means. It feels like they're trying to keep creators from leaving by putting up small roadblocks that limit our reach beyond the platform. Given PeerTube's non-profit model, I see it as a potential future for content sharing. Though there are a few rock stars on YouTube, most of the creators on that platform make little to no money from publishing videos. There are more people like me than Linus Media Group.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 2 days ago (22 children)

It's about time we try to de-google.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm honestly surprised peertube has lasted as long as it has as it is

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (10 children)

It still lasts because there's no easy way YT can offer their own content without the video being available as a file stream (through CDNs at googlevideos subdomains). If they centralize everything to a single, controlled domain (so to allow things as one-time HTTPS request, better session checking and so on), they'd lost the capability of load balancing allowed by the decentralized nature of CDNs. YouTube downloaders (and, by extension, third-party YT frontends such as Invidious) exploit this CDN aspect to download the videos.

It's common to see Invidious instances momentarily blocked. The blockage can't last forever for two reasons: firstly, IPs (especially IPv4) changes due to how ISPs offer IPv4 addresses through CGNAT, so the instance IPv4 (generally domestic servers) will eventually change (often to a completely different IPv4 range) and YouTube won't know that the new IP is a former "offender". Secondly, as IPv4s works through CGNAT, Google can't keep the bans forever because this IPv4 will be eventually rotated to another client from ISP that's completely unrelated and unaware of how their IPv4 was a former address for a downloader. It's like how Signal/WhatsApp/Telegram/Facebook/phone-required services can't really keep a permanent ban for a specific prepaid number (especially on countries like Brazil, where ANATEL allows for phone number rotation when the mobile plan is cancelled), because the number will be potentially owned by another person with nothing to do with the former owner.

So, in summary, Google can either end with YouTube CDNs (ditching their load balancing), or they can try to implement an innovative way to keep load balancing while serving the request one-time only, or they won't be able to do nothing but to perpetually catch themselves drying ice cubes.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›