this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

movies

22784 readers
88 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Uh, spoilers I guess for TNG season 2 generally and TMoaM specifically.


We're watching TNG for the first time (not counting seeing random out of order episodes when my aunt was watching me decades ago) and so far season 2 is definitely better, but the dehumanization of Data has been driving me up a wall.

This fuckin doctor who isn't Beverly Crusher consistently treating him like a thing and even being smug about it as she learns that she's wrong was bad enough to start with

But now we have this asshole calling him "it" repeatedly and saying that he's Starfleet property, doing the "well if one of Data's best friends doesn't make a sincere argument that he's a nonperson, I'll just immediately declare that he's a nonperson" etc.

Just unreal "justice system" brain worms. Oh is the question of whether this individual, who clearly has feelings and desires, deserves to have literally any personal rights more fitting for "saints and philosophers" you dumb lawyer hog

And finally the smug science nerd space fascist right here.

This guy's insistence that in spite of not understanding Data's construction at all basically, he should be allowed to vivisect him and poke around in his brain was absurd. Like, once people start asking him any questions about his plans for the experiment he immediately makes it clear that he doesn't know shit and hasn't considered the dangers to Data at all. The moment during the trial when Picard demands that he distinguish the traits that Picard demands has and Data lacks that makes only Picard sentient and he whines that the question is "difficult" holy shit I was funing. He loses the court case obviously but frankly I am mad that (and I know that TNG isn't this show) nobody shot him in the head with a phaser.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

For all its development culturally, The Federation's legal system always feels like it's being made up on the spot by everyone involved. And I guess that's because it is - Star Trek's writers were much more interested in questions of Sci Fi ethics than in answering the question of how their utopian society actually functioned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, if you look at it from the out of character point of view that the legal system in the federation is like that as a a vehicle for Captain Picard to make a passionate speech that being like that is bad and the federation can and should do better it makes a lot more sense.

I still hate Commander Maddox though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Aww shit I just started season 2 after finally watching season 1 all the way through, and Dr. Not-Beverly-Crusher has already annoyed me with the smug. I guess I'll strap in for this season.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

He loses the court case obviously but frankly I am mad that (and I know that TNG isn't this show) nobody shot him in the head with a phaser.

well, ST:P got close sadness

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He has a positronic brain! hst-gun

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

data-laughing LLM Hallucination.