I don't see why these 2 would be related, but isn't it early to be concluding this if these kids are only like 3 years old?
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2239 readers
49 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Likely it was a study because there are too many stupid people that believe that vaccines cause autism. Society as a whole has lost the ability to critical think.
Yeah, I guess there's some value in proving a negative.
But it's also pretty expensive to test every stupid statement somebody said.
Early therapy is more effective, as well as less potentially traumatizing. To the point that false positives aren't really a concern.
The most effective therapies just seem like heavilly supervised play-time to your average young kiddo.
It pains me that we actually needs to do a study on this.
Negative results are still results!
That's a pity, we would benefit from more scientists and engineers.
Rather hurtful stereotype.