this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

NotAwfulTech

347 readers
1 users here now

a community for posting cool tech news you don’t want to sneer at

non-awfulness of tech is not required or else we wouldn’t have any posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

'cuz I definitely do

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If they're going to make this, I will coerce my daughter into coercing my wife to let me buy it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Neat!

E: also, this means that if the AI = AGI people are right, lego could be used to run an intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Me: steps on lego brick

Simulation voice of god: “THE BASILISK SENDS ITS REGARDS!”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Yud finally has a tool that even the acausalrobotgod fears

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

you can’t just put me at financial risk like this

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

broke: acausal blackmail

woke: acausal trade

bespoke: acausal marketing

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah I was grimacing at the partlist, but I think I'd still do it

I haven't meaningfully touched lego in like 15y and haven't engaged with basically any of the starwars-y or latter-decades kits at all. but for this.. it'd make a hell of a sweet display piece

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I really hope the complexity doesn’t make it a no-go for Lego — honestly this is one of the only times I’d be in support of custom pieces if it makes assembly easier or the machine more durable

I haven’t really engaged with Lego at all since I got into 3D printing, but them going “fuck it we’ll do mechanical computation” would definitely pull me back in. this is exactly the kind of thing that’d be a major pain to do with printed parts, where consistent and durable standardized parts would do a lot better

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool idea but the build techniques would have to modified for the mass market.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So in the video there were two things that made me go ‘ahh that’s not really gonna fly for a mass marketed product’

One was the multiple beams at specific positions on multiple axles that require a lot of fine tuning.

Either you’d have to pack the axle with other pieces to make it fool proof or these would get out of whack over time causing issues.

The other (more problematic) issue IMO was the rotating mechanism at the top of the build. This seemed to use non-standard spacing by having rigid hose pieces connected to the 24 tooth gear.

Just don’t think that would ever fly and would need to be reengineered.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

yeah, but like .... yeah? this is a thing someone put together from the spectrum of existing parts, to show the viability, and pitch as a kit because it's neat

pretty obviously any commercial version of it would have to be more buttoned up. that's literally in the product design loop

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

can't tell if you were joking or are unfamiliar with what a turing machine is