What a waste of money, ask any independent climate scientist what you could could spend £22bn on, carbon capture and storage wouldn’t even be in the top 100 suggestions.
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
25 points (93.1% liked)
United Kingdom
4060 readers
102 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wait, I've seen quite a few articles claiming carbon capture was basically an oil industry myth. Are we sure we should be investing in that instead of some things which have more proven effectiveness like renewables?
Government pledges nearly £22bn for regulatory capture projects
fucking hell, how much are they shelling out for carbon emission reductions (like, say, public tranist)
£22bn to literally sweep the problem under the carpet, allowing the oil and gas industry to continue.
What's the opportunity cost of this? What could that money have built instead?
The fuckin NHS for a start
The laws of physics mean that no matter what we do with carbon capture it is never going to be cheaper and less energy to emit it and then capture it again. This is a foolish endeavour the focus should be on the green transition with Wind, Solar and Storage combined with ensuring infrastructure is there for Electric Vehicle transition. This is the sort of investment the fossil fuel wants governments to make that will have no impact and allow them to continue to emit.
The laws of physics mean that no matter what we do with carbon capture it is never going to be cheaper and less energy to emit it and then capture it again
That's not the same as saying it'll emit more carbon than it captures, which seems to be what you're tilting at.
We need to undo the damage we have already done. Carbon dioxide has a climate delay time of about 200ish years, so it's critical that we remove historical carbon, or we are totally buggered, regardless of what we do with green energy today.
Why plant trees when you can invest in bill gates future project?
What do we do with all the carbon we capture and store? Can we use it for something else? If not then we need to stop producing it, not just sticking it into a landfill like we have with our rubbish for the last hundred years or so.
I think carbon landfill is a great term for it.
For fuck's sake.