this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1213 points (86.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9666 readers
83 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Diversity is good. Different types of homes and zoning. Mix of nature and buildings

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I live in a flat and it sucks. I'll probably move to living in a car eventually.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, try living in an impoverished town, where it's the housing on the right, spread out like the housing on the left. There are, like, no jobs (none that are actually sustainable long-term for living in this economy), but they just leveled a huge area of forest for more low-income housing (AKA Projects)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

The US has about 10 million square kilometers

That's 10 million x 1 million square meters (10^13 )

There will soon be (source: people like sex) 10 billion people on earth (10^10 )

This would give you 10^13 / 10^10 = 10^3 square meters (10700 square feet) of land for everyone on earth to live on. EVERY SINGLE PERSON. Not families, individual fucking people.

All of them contained within the US.

10700 square feet to build a house, have a small garden etc. Okay, not a lot. But that's one country that could house everyone. An extreme example of course - you're not gonna be able to use all that land, some of it is uninhabitable (red states lol). But just imagine it for a second, everyone living in one country would still be comfortable. And look how much is left of the rest of the world.

1000 square meters isn't enough space? Make your house have 4 stories, who gives a shit, make your own wizard tower. In a relationship? That's 21400 square feet for the couple. Have a couple of kids? 42800 square feet. That's a decent enough house+yard for 4 people, especially if you add one or two floors.

The problem is not that there isn't enough space. The problem is that some motherfuckers want and get more than their share of square feet. And then they charge you money to live in their share of land without owning it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

You would need to travel like 5 miles to get anywhere at minimum... meaning you would need a car. And that is the opposite point of this entire sub

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Now connect all these people to water, sewage, roads and power.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, yeah, apartments and such should be widely available. Awesome for high population areas, young folks, temporary housing situations, etc. Had a flat for years and will for at least a few more. However, as a drummer (and general loud music enthusiast) I am very ready to get out of the flat and get into a proper house with a basement, garage, patio for grilling with da boyes, etc.

A good mix of both is ideal. I sure wish we took better measures to mitigate the insane housing prices tho'. Sick of thin walls and and a single room trying to replace 4 rooms.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And they look like they were made in 2000s oppressive architecture

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks around at all the houses

I think we have our answer already.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Why aren't there any trees around the houses?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here, buying an apartment makes you liable for any structural issues to the whole building, it's a huge risk and with how terrible build quality is these days I'd never buy an apartment

There are many highrise buildings in Australia with residents paying hundreds of thousands each for issues caused by dodgy builders. The builder simply closes the business during the warranty period and they are off the hook for claims

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I am sorry but wouldn't be the same issue with a house? It's still done by a builder. Plus in the apartments case the costs are shared, yeah they might be bigger but the house costs are all you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›