this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
606 points (95.5% liked)

Data is Beautiful

4770 readers
164 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's been trending this way for years, but seeing it graphed out like this is shocking.

What do you think are the effects of this drastic change?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I wish there was some granularity to "online." I met my wife on a BBS in 94. It wasn't a dating site, it was a discussion board, and neither of us was looking to hook up with anyone. There are lots of things like that, but I'm guessing dating apps/sites are the biggest component.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The number of people that met on BBS would probably not even register as a line on that graph, lol. You are a rare gem, good sir or madam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, WoW would be a not insignificant chunk of people that met online if it was split up into more granular data.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

I first dated online in 1999, and the first woman I dated I ended up marrying and having two kids with, though we divorced in 2017.

I still date online these days, and I prefer it. It allows me to know a little about a person before I waste any time chatting them up, and the things I need to know are things they generally put on their profile. Things like their sexuality (since I am non-binary), their political leaning (I'm socialist), their relationship orientation (I'm polyamorous), whether our values match...you know...important shit. And those early conversations before we ever meet in person are low-key enough that I feel more comfortable with them IRL, something that helps me as an autistic person.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I'm personally thrilled not to be bound by the recommendations of my friends or family. Or work?! Gross!

People: "Oh hey there Digital Frontier, looking forward to the opportunity" The Permanently Online: "Get out of my swamp!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Meeting online seems like the best way to me. Better to date people you have stuff in common with rather than just picking your partners through circumstance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's almost like something happened in 2020 to cause a big spike. I wonder what that could have been, and if it is still the case.

Ah, life is full of mysteries.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Except the graph ends with 2020, so I'm not sure it even includes whatever mystery events might have biased things towards online that year.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

I met my spouse online in the naughts, and it was unusual and required explaining to most people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wouldn't have expected schools to be so low tbh

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To think it all started with DoD nerds hooking up in the 80s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Look at the date of the latest piece of data, and you have your answer

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Huh. I never knew that people really do meet at bars for more than just a one night stand.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is more that you meet them for a one night stand. Then you decide to hang out later. Then you wake up one day and you two are married with children.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, one night stands can turn into lasting relationships. I know a decent number of married couples who met in zero-commitment contexts, whether it's a hookup from a bar or while on vacation in a tourist town or things like that. Or even meeting on a hookup-oriented app that somehow turned into a not-just-for-hookups service after becoming acquired by Match, but during the phase when it was most definitely mainly for no-strings hookups.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why the rise in meeting people at work in the 1980s? Was this when there was an increase in office jobs?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why does the graph use 5 shades of gray for some categories?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Surely this graph is wrong? In 1974 couples used to meet while kung fu fighting. A lot of research tends to prove it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's hard to get a headcount when people are fast as lightning.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Q: "Why didn't you get in touch with that guy you met at the kung fu fight?"

A: "In fact, he was a little bit frightening..."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›