this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
271 points (98.9% liked)

News

23655 readers
3429 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Military leaders claim Tommy Tuberville's actions are a national security risk, but the senator is defiant.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He will NOT be appointing officials for an organization that kills people until the government stops allowing abortions. Just let the logic sink in for a while. The guy's a POS, and nobody should be surprised that a single issue candidate is only interested in a single issue.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not to mention that because of the standing rules of the Senate, all you have to do is send an email saying you’re filibustering and any one person can bring to halt something all the other 99 Senators just want to move on to the next topic.

Literally this guy stands alone on this and the brain dead rules allow him and him alone to bring it all to a halt.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

And the rules won't change because most of the Senate loves that someone else can halt things, take the heat, and then they won't have to deal with unpopular decisions.

Not in this case, but they're literally willing to force the military fuck over career professionals so that they can keep their cushy plausible deniability.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well no, they could hold a cloture vote any time on every nominee. They need 67 senators to vote to end the filibuster.

They haven’t forced cloture because enough republicans support him in the background and wouldn’t vote for it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could also change the rules with a simple majority and do what needs done, but that's going to be a last resort desperate measure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It funny/sad that allowing the Senate to function in the absence of a supermajority is seen as a desperate measure. Too me it seems like the only reasonable thing to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

So many self-serving rules. And honestly, if we held any of them accountable to their campaign promises we might actually have a functioning congress. But here we are.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is the real problem, and it's infuriating. Not only because of the way it stops the Senate from doing so many things, but because so many people now believe it's how the filibuster had always worked. And so people hate it.

But, in fact, the filibuster, in its original form, is a powerful tool the minority can use to make its voice heard and perhaps even effect change. It needs to come back - make Tuberville stand up and talk for hours on end for each of these appointees he opposes. Make McTurtle totter to center stage and wheeze for as long as he can the next time he wants to block a Democrat President's Supreme Court Judge.

I'll bring the popcorn.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...in an effort to force the Biden administration's defense department to rescind a policy of leave and expense reimbursement for service members and their dependents traveling for abortions.

I can only assume this is for bases that don't have the means to just do it themselves. I was a surgical tech in the Air Force, and every hospital I was stationed at provided abortion services.

The VA does, too.

Cuz abortion services ARE FUCKING HEALTHCARE. You want to destroy a service member's mission readiness? Give them a kid they can't support.

You don't want to pay service members to travel for abortions? Fine. Fine. Equip and staff every single military base with an OBGYN clinic w/ surgical capabilities. Don't want to give them med leave to recover from an abortion? Fucking FINE. Schedule a uteroscopy and biopsy along with it so we can throw in a cancer screen, nab any polyps, ablate any endometriosis, etc; and give them extra leave for those, cuz damn was that one a bleeder! She'll need extra time to recover for sure!!

Do the same at VAs, cuz on federal facilities, state law can eat a bag of dicks.

Then declare a state of emergency in the Y'all Qaeda infested regions of the US on the basis of denied healthcare leading to the current and worsening humanitarian crisis; and in doing so, enabling the VA to provide abortion services to non-veterans under section §1784 of title 38, United States Code.

This dystopian GOP shit is maddening. We need to stop trying to argue with it, and start finding ways to just work around it. Fuck em.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Working around the GOP's bullshit is a short-term solution. They need to be permanently removed from power.

[–] Zamotic 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then we need to do the short term solution while we work on the long term solution. I'm kind of sick of one side trying to keep it a fair fight. GOP politicians have all shown they don't care about that and will employ any means necessary to get their policies enacted while doing everything they can to disrupt the policies on the other side

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do the same at VAs

The problem with that is that it may have been legal at the place it was done, but states would absolutely place police next door to wait for those women to come out. They already have laws that criminalize women who go out of state

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tuberville is a complete imbecile. That’s not a baseless ad-hominem attack - he’s established a solid, bipartisan reputation in the Senate as the densest, dumbest motherfucker who’s been elected to that legislative body in a long, long time.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Notice that the comment you're responding to specifically qualifies him as the dumbest person in the Senate. There's a lot more competition for "dumbest member of Congress" in the house. Boebert is still a representative (for now at least), after all.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Not to mention, Greene. And Gaetz.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't forget meat puppet Senator Ted "Cancun" Cruz!

While Bobert probably has a singular brain cell randomly impacting her skull forcing a vomit of nonsense from her mouth. Cruzy boy barely classifies as sapient even after he's been loaded up with whatever bullshit he's meant to unload into people ear cannals.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

The difference is that Raphael Cruz is a Princeton and Harvard educated attorney who understands that he's unloading bullshit as part of a political grift. Boebert barely got her G.E.D. and truly believes every idiotic word that comes out of her mouth.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Well, in point of fact, Cruz actually appears to be somewhat intelligent, based on transcripts of private conversations he’s had. It’s just that he’s an asshole who had pretty much zero integrity. And everyone knows it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People keep naming others, but after hearing him say things like we don't want poets in the military and whit supremacy isn't racist, I think he's so fucking stupid he can barely breathe. He also insists people call him Coach instead of Senator, which is also unbelievably stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We should be so lucky to have someone on the left in Congress with a political project they believed in so much that they would do something like this.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Can you imagine the screeching if dems were doing this over literally anything?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

The issue is that by Senate policy, one person can throw a massive wrench in the process and grind things to a halt. Progressives typically want to do things, which cannot be done by one person throwing a hissy fit.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the news it appears that the USA has a political system where fairly important things can be shut down by just a single person. It also appears that every time this happens that the single person is a monumental asshole. Is there any reasonable explanation for this? I am guessing no but it is still happening and fairly often....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

I wonder how quickly Tommy Tuberville would have driven one of his sons' girlfriends to an abortion clinic if they got her pregnant in high school...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

How does this guy remember how to breathe every day?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

We need legislation to prevent this type of government meddling. Just like with the filibuster. Asshole.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Time to make Alabama hurt.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What could we possibly do that they haven't already done to themselves?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Currently living in Alabama, I really wish there wasn’t quite so much truth in this statement.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I was stationed in Biloxi, MS for over a year and almost went insane of boredom on base. We thought "hey let's visit Mobile" once, so we did. After that we accepted dying of boredom rather than ever go back to AL.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›