Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers

391 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How Intellectual Property Laws Stifle Innovation. (mises.org)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In conclusion, while the alleged intention behind intellectual property laws may be to foster innovation, their practical effect is often to hinder it. The right to innovate—to freely explore, develop, and share new ideas—is fundamental to human progress and should not be unduly restricted by overzealous attempts to commodify knowledge. As we navigate the complex landscape of 21st-century innovation, it is crucial to critically examine and reform IP laws to ensure they serve their intended purpose of promoting progress rather than stifling it.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

Are you telling me IP wasn’t intended to be an eternal monopoly?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

While not entirely wrong, I'd take anything out of free market fundamentalists mouths like the ones at Mises with a gain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

IP is trash but it's not going to be fixed by pseudo-scientific capitalist ideology.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Like wealth disparity, you see people claiming more and more within the realm of IP. Where does this sort of land grabbing end?