this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
1048 points (94.0% liked)

Comic Strips

12601 readers
3157 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

rare non-horny Extra Fabulous comic

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

there's probably just missing frames

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (17 children)

Stupid question here, I guess, but why isn't there a system to potentially deliver commercial passengers and crew to the ground in case of a crash? Military jets have ejection seats and parachutes, so why don't we have at least something required for commercial aircraft in the same vein?

Is it the money that it would undoubtedly require?

Edit: misspelling

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

An explosive release canopy for an ejection seat system on an airliner would just release the entire top half of the plane, and don't forget that fighter pilots are both wearing flightsuits and get specific training for the event.

Even beyond the material and engineering costs it's a difficult ask, probably better to just focus on reliability in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok but what about instead of an explosive release canopy, the crew just sorta loosen some of the bolts holding the top of the plane on, then the pilot flies upside-down to gently tip everyone out of their seats

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds perfect, no notes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I remember seeing an article back in the 90s or maybe even 80s that was exploring the possibility of the entire passenger compartment separating from the wings and rest of the fuselage and parachuting down in the event of a major failure. The thing is, it would be ridiculously expensive to implement, and there are very few situations where such a system would be any better than keeping the plane in one piece.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What's the point of wearing a helmet when skydiving? If your chute doesn't open, are you supposed to try and land head first so it will protect you? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it really does help in crashes though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Similar to a car crash, you are generally safer in your padded engineered metal box than being thrown out of it, or thrown around inside it.

It’s like the difference between dropping a carton of eggs vs a bunch of loose eggs in a box.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

That joke was made by Miguel Gila, a Spaniard comedian, decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So it doesn't matter on Southwest?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›