this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
907 points (97.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

1092 readers
440 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Trump will go down in history as the world's most successful career criminal.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Is it really a law if it's unenforceable?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

*selectively enforced against poor people

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago
  • The understood value of "poor" will also increase.
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Is it really justice when laws cannot be applied to presidents as the founding fathers argued that doing so would interfere with president's purported ability to govern - even if they commit crimes?

The USA is comically naive in assuming presidents would act honorably and would respect the law voluntarily.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 days ago

No I'm sure the current plan of wag your finger and then refuse to actually enforce the law out of a desire to "not sink to his low" will continue to work just fine /s

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Crumbling empire

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago (2 children)

as someone who has never used twitter, it always confuses me that twitter sometimes puts the reply before the message that’s being replied to. why do it this way?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It isn't so much as a reply on a re-tweet, if you comment or "reply" to any tweet then the layout is the same as any other social media site and nests it under the post. Whereas for re-tweeting it is more like sharing something, like a link or an article, and your desired message into a post, just like here in lemmy your title or message is at the top and your content is under it. In this context the tweet is your content.

I hope that made sense

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

this does make sense. thank you for explaining it. i had always thought that retweet was the twitter word for reply (a reply that is also a tweet), but this makes way more sense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If you're following someone but not the person they're replying to, this is how it shows up because the design assumes you're more interested in what the person you're following has to say, and just includes the original for context

disclaimer: I don't really use the website so I could be slightly off. It probably doesn't require you only be following one of the two users, moreso that reply tweets (sorry, reply Xs on X) from people you follow show like "normal" top level posts in your feed

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago (10 children)

This was the last time i vote for a dem candidate. they pay mouth service to progressive policies, but at the end of the day, they do next to nothing for us.

back in in the 2010s when obama was president, there was a time when the dems controlled the house AND the senate at the same time. we still didn't get any real progressive shit passed. the only thing i can think of is daca and obamacare. we didn't get single payer, universal nationalized healthcare, we didn't get robust protections for the working class, we didn't responsibly pull out of iraq or afghanistan, the environment is fucked and there's nothing that we can do about it anymore, big banks got bailed out at the expense of the working class, university cost was and has continued to be at an all time high. They didn't fix the gerrymandering the gop has been getting away with. They didn't set term limits on justices. they didn't fight back when the Rs blocked merick garland. They did nothing to fix the broken electoral system. They did nothing to fix the economic policies set in the reagan era. they did nothing to set a law banning PACs, lobbyists or special interests. the only thing the dem party has going for it is that they are not literally the party of fascists.

2 weeks before the election wasn't the time to start getting excited about a third party. The time for third partying is now, and keep it up until the next one. I'm not going to forgive the dem party for their inaction and they should absolutely be punished by no longer existing as the opposition party.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Didn't even close fucking Guantanamo. Remember Guantanamo? It's still a thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

This was the last time i vote for a dem candidate. they pay mouth service to progressive policies, but at the end of the day, they do next to nothing for us.

I'm genuinely hoping (but not holding my breath) that this is a come to Jesus moment for the Democratic party and that they start actually representing the left side. They need to get it through their heads that trying to play the "lesser evil" isn't going to work anymore. If they didn't learn from this election, they will never learn. I'm expecting the latter, btw.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This was the last time i vote for a dem candidate.

I'm sure that'll fix things right up!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This reformist sentiment is how we got here with the Dems.

I could understand reform to an extent but holy fuck come on. They've demonstrated they really truly don't give a fuck about the leftist ideals they carry around like a vestigial organ.

Kamala "Do Not Come" Harris Joe "Nothing will fundamentally change" Biden (Bonus) Joe "Strongest union president ever until it might impact the economy" Biden Nancy "Insider trading is cool when I do it" Pelosi

They exist as the last wall between more serious leftists and actual change.

They co-opt and absorb grassroots movements and then talk them down into a whimper. (e.g. BLM, defund the police, single-payer, etc.) Usually the discourse devolves into "well it might be hard and take some time, and it's something we're not used to, and some people might be mad too, and oh the economy and jobs or something" and that's that. Dismissed until the next crisis, where we'll rinse and repeat.

Notice the verbiage when they're talking: "middle-class" this "middle-class" that. How often do they talk about the lower class? They usually don't, because they primarily want to appeal to the affluent and educated. Meanwhile actual leftist organization meet people where they are on the regular - hungry, unsheltered, endangered - instead of sitting at galas and fundraisers sucking the big green dollary dick and feeling really sad and concerned about those people on the street. But hey maybe more spikes on a bench and more camp raids will solve the problem. After all, they're making the place unsightly for their affluent, educated friends.

"When they go low we go high" is a hollow appeal to civility they use to say "aw shucks guys we tried real hard but then Republicans said no". How many times have Republicans whipped out that "one simple trick" to leverage their position? How many times are Democrats gonna say "hey man that's not cool" until they realize that honor or decorum are like boyscout merrit badges in the face of an opposition that demonstrates they don't give a fuck about any of that?

Right or "left" or anything in between - any time there's a labor dispute you can bet (and you'd be quite succesful) that within the first WEEK they'll be drumming up distrust amongst the working class:

They tell their fellow workers through the media "these union workers are making your shit cost more. Here's how much their asking for in wage increases."

To ask "well, couldn't the company just make a little bit less" is heresy. How could you suggest such a thing? They're a business dummy, they have to make money! Line goes up! Line go down is bad! Jobs and yadda yadda.

They frame the majority of the conversation in terms of monetary or fringe benefits for the workers. They report very little on the safety and PTO/QOL demands of the union.

In the case of Biden and railroad workers, they say "hey just play along and let the rail companies strategize and undermine you for a few more years while we try really super megahard to get you what you want". Newsflash if you didn't know: the element of surprise (within a short time frame) is important for strikes. Now that the companies know the union is willing to take it to that level, the railroad companies being in a position of power and control are in an advantageous position with that knowledge. And by the way nothing was ever done about the safety concerns the rail workers had with PSR or lean operation (or the being on call constantly), and shortly after Biden put down that strike the East Palestine disaster happened. And yeah those people aren't done with their suffering either. But hey at least you, out precious affluent, educated voter didn't have to do anything to support your fellow workers or deal with any upset in your life.

And then there's the laser-focus on identity issues. WHILE IMPORTANT, you know what most helps people in these groups fight for their rights? Better working conditions. Better benefits. Better healthcare. Better work-life balance. More time off to organize, more time off to participate in politics, or spend time with family, or do hobbies, or relax, or do anything that might give them solid footing against the ebbs and flows of capital and fight for themselves and their own rights and communities. Not that help from more advantaged people isn't useful, but when that's step one instead of step four or five it comes off as a "white man's burden" approach. Give them the foundation that every working person deserves.

No one's required to vote for your dog shit, milquetoast party and their old crusty ass kingmakers. And before you start coming at me with the usual stuff, I voted for Harris to buy more time for vulnerable people, leftists, and whatever semblance of free expression and journalism we have left. I sucked it up and put my opinions aside for a bit.

And wow what a fucking waste. How could that party fuck up so bad? Maybe they didn't pay enough money to political consultants? Surely that's the reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Dont worry. With some luck you wont need to

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OpenPassageways 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yet another reminder that most Americans don't understand how the government works. What is one Dem senator going to do in a government that is 100% controlled by Republicans?

Voters need to do something and actually give the Dems a majority before complaining that they don't get anything done.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The Dems still control the Executive, including the Attorney General, and the Senate.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Twitter is dumb as fucking fuck. Political leaders shouldn't be there. If you shitpost, you shouldn't be in charge of anything but shitposting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

They didn't before and won't do it now.

load more comments
view more: next ›