Businesses don't care about their employees beyond their output.
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
207 points (98.6% liked)
PC Gaming
8576 readers
343 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That’s because employees are seen as a liability, while holdings are seen as value.
Basically, employees need to be paid, so having a lot of employees hurts your company value. But owning immaterial things helps company value, because you don’t need to pay for ideas beyond the initial investment.
So headlines like these are common any time a company is looking to boost their stock. Lay off a bunch of employees to reduce cash out, use that freshly gained cash to buy intellectual properties (or buy the companies that own that IP) and then sit on the IP because actually using it would require employees like the ones you just laid off. You don’t care about actually leveraging the IP, because simply owning it is what gives you the value bump. You’re not worried about income from those IPs yet, because you’re just trying to make the company larger with the existing cash you have access to.
>Acquire studios
>Don't make any new games
What's this strategy is called?
Monopoly
Stock market.
Say the line Bart!
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish
They unfortunately forgot the second step and went straight the extinguish.
Embrace, extend, and extinguish" (EEE), also known as "embrace, extend, and exterminate", is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found was used internally by Microsoft to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used open standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and using the differences to strongly disadvantage its competitors
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish
Microsoft sucks but the phrase doesn't really apply to company acquisitions
I'll admit I'm using it loosely here because it's fun
Fair enough, I'm being overly pedantic
The march towards three megacorps running the entire economy continues now that Donnie’s back. It was nice having four years of resistance to unfettered acquisitions.
Capitalism forces companies to make stupid fucking decisions?!?! shocked Pikachu face
My company just did the same thing. Just layed off 15% of staff because of some bad quarters but is now looking into mergers and acquisitions because they think/know the senile microphone abuser will let tech consolidation run wild.
From Bloomberg
“We definitely want to be in the market, and when we can find teams and technology and capability that add to what we’re trying to do in gaming at Microsoft, absolutely we will keep our heads up,” Spencer said. Still, there’s nothing “imminent” and very large deals are probably off the table at present as the company is spending a lot of time absorbing Activision Blizzard employees, he said.
OOO HYEAH IM ACQUIRINGGGGGGG
Wait… if corps are people, have they now got anorexia?
Scum. Learn to code, Microsoft.
Can someone help with clarifying a few things?
There is a build up to the full issue, so I'm going to set a few entry questions:
- Are the acquired studios privately owned or in the market, open for hostile takeovers?