this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
933 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5220 readers
1658 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

You need to explain that, though they are generally rich, it's not unusual for unheard of princes to occasionally fall on hard times and have their fortunes compensated until they are able to pay a ransom to get a corrupt bank or government to release their vast wealth back to them AND that they are almost always grateful to anyone who assists them in paying that ransom.

Oh wait, sorry, wrong scam.

Wouldn't you find it useful to be able to prove that you paid for something? When you buy an NFT, you're buying just that: the ability to prove that you bought it. And sometimes it even comes with a copy of an image or a spaceship you might just be able to use in a video game or just hold on to until we develop the technology to live in video game spaceships and you sell it for massive profits!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Idk why everyone rips on blockchain just because it's used for dumb things. If we used blockchain for voting we wouldn't be going back and forth on election integrity.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

Highly unlikely. For all intents and purposes it is impossible to create any system, that is anyonymus and trustworthy. And in voting one is exactly as important as the other. If you tried to make electronic voting, keep in mind, that ANY DEVICE in the chain that runs even microcode, or has any form of firmware is suspect. Better cryptography almost makes things worse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Turn that into an NFT, nerd.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is bait. It's gotta be.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

If this was Reddit this would be posted on a "CryptobrosLs" communities or something

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago

Reddit has had a "Buttcoin" subreddit making fun of Bitcoin since 2011!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 21 hours ago

Hah your mom has a cool boyfriend.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My advice is for you to wipe my butt clean with your tongue my guy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Ah fuck. I'm in a public stall and just giggle farted.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago

I’m not your bidet, buddy!

[–] [email protected] 210 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mom's new boyfriend is a smart fella, but her son seems to be a fart smella.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Modern day poetry, 👌👌👌👌

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

We need a community for internet comment's poetry.

[–] tigeruppercut 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most hilarious tongue twister for kids under 10:

One smart fella, he felt smart
Two smart fellas, they felt smart
Three smart fellas, they all felt smart

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

How did this one not make the rounds when I was a kid? All we had was Claude Balls, Seymour Butts, and Jack Mehoff. Oh and super racist stuff about the Polish that stays dead.

[–] tigeruppercut 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't he on top of many of these pyramid chains?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Probably would if he could

[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 day ago (61 children)

I’ve read that blockchain itself is a good technology. NFTs are a laughably absurd attempt to exploit that technology for profit.

Xitter op needs to shut up.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's one of those things where scientists discovered something interesting and novel, and then a bunch of dumb grifters came in to try and make it their new snake oil.

A very, very long time ago, back when Bitcoin was viewed as a currency instead of an "investment" platform, Bitcoin kinda fulfilled the ideal use case for the blockchain. I think now the general public is just too soured on them for that to ever be the case, unless Elon makes Bitcoin the new currency of the U.S...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I seriously think his plan is fuck up the US economy so bad that the dollar hyperinflates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Don't worry, other countries won't let it happen because their economies are held hostage by US.

[–] [email protected] 146 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (49 children)

Blockchain is a solution in search of a problem. A way to establish trust while not trusting any party is a cool concept, but in the real world it's far easier to establish a source of trust.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

It is a bad solution though, because it revolves around wasting tons of energy in solving made up problems no one actually needs the solution to. I know there's alternative cryptocurrency that use better methods or solve actual problems but 90% of it is bitcoin.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Congratulations, now your trust relies on your subject never becoming important enough that someone bothers to run 50%+1 of the nodes in your network which means only very, very large subjects (or ones where trust wasn't very important in the first place) ever even have a chance of that not happening. What do you say? Your technology doesn't scale to very, very large subjects because of abysmal transaction rates?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

now your trust relies on your subject never becoming important enough that someone bothers to run 50%+1 of the nodes in your network

Yup. Very well said. People don't realize the extent of wealth inequality (and how ridiculously resource intensive blockchain tech is). If anything important were to be decide by a blockchain, the top 1% would control the network.

More on wealth inequality here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Today's inequality was created by the Cantillon effect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Soviet Union launched Venus-8

load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (59 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Relationships are like the blockchain.
There's no trusted, central database of all relationships that determines what is or isn't cheating.
That trust is negotiated in each interaction.

Marriages follow the traditional method of a chain of trust. There is a central database that lies with the government or the church, and everyone decides which database they want to trust.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You must have an interesting social life that every time you hook up, all past relationships immediately contact each other and vote on whether you are a cheater.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

His real name is Scott Pilgrim.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›