this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
89 points (94.9% liked)

News

23287 readers
4012 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

California may soon lift a ban on state-funded travel to states with anti-LGBTQ+ laws and instead focus on an advertising campaign to bring anti-discrimination messages to red states.

California started banning official travel to states with laws it deemed discriminatory against LGBTQ+ people in 2017, starting with Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina and Tennessee. Since then, the list has grown to include a total of 26 states, most of them Republican-led, following a surge of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation these past few years.

The prohibition has prevented elected officials, state workers and university scholars from traveling to more than half of the country using the state’s money. That has posed a significant challenge to sports teams at public colleges and universities, which have had to find alternative funding sources to pay for their road games in states like Arizona and Utah. It has also complicated some of the state’s other policy goals, like using state money to pay for people who live in other states to travel to California for abortions.

California lawmakers in the state Assembly on Monday passed legislation to end the travel ban. The bill, introduced by state Senate leader Toni Atkins, would also establish an outreach and advertising campaign in states on the travel ban list to promote pro-LGBTQ+ messages. Atkins, who is a lesbian, said the travel ban has helped raise awareness about many anti-LGBTQ+ issues, but it has also led to unintended consequences.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago (2 children)

university scholars from traveling to more than half of the country using the state’s money. That has posed a significant challenge to sports teams at public colleges and universities, which have had to find alternative funding sources to pay for their road games in states like Arizona and Utah.

Umm... why the fuck are state dollars being used for college sports teams?

Tuition isn't free, why is the taxpayer footing the bill?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

THANK YOU. Honestly the amount of taxpayer money our educational institutions spend in actual games is ridiculous. Meanwhile the physics department at my local CalState school had to cancel classes earlier this year due to a heat wave – their building doesn’t have A/C.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was reading through this and saw:

The prohibition has prevented elected officials, state workers and university scholars from traveling to more than half of the country using the state’s money.

and thought, "wow, that's really unfortunate". Then I saw:

That has posed a significant challenge to sports teams at public colleges and universities

and thought "ah, there it is, the real motivation for this".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

State college, state college sports program. I don't see an issue.

Where I see an issue is when the sports program gets more attention and funding than the academic programs. Students should be students first, athletes second.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is that these institutions charge tuition yet still receive taxpayer dollars.

It should be one or the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see why it should be all or nothing. The split/pricing definitely needs some work, but having higher education be subsidized but not completely funded by the state is pretty reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why should they get taxpayer money to waste it on sports? To appease meatheads who don't belong in college in the first place.

Why should they get taxpayer money and still charge tuition? To make rich people richer faster.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Why should they get taxpayer money and still charge tuition?

Because if they didn’t tuition would be even higher.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feel like the intent was right but they need to mulligan this idea. It's probably better to provide people incentives to leave those states and otherwise make strong arm policies against providing aid to the governments of those states.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s probably better to provide people incentives to leave those states

I think it's better to convince the people in those states to vote for better policies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I have faimly in at least three of those states.. it's funny you think that A) they're going to vote at all and B) that they vote based on information and facts. But also yes we need to empower people

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You are giving conservatives way too much credit. You cannot convince a conservative to just start being a human. It's just not in them to be human.