this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

News

23320 readers
3334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) plans to ask a judge to force Google to sell its Chrome browser, aiming to break up its dominance in the search market and address antitrust violations.

The DoJ also seeks structural remedies for Google’s role in artificial intelligence and the Android ecosystem, along with data licensing requirements.

Google, controlling 90% of the global search market, has called the actions an overreach that would harm consumers.

This follows an earlier court ruling finding Google guilty of maintaining an illegal monopoly. Proposed remedies are due by December 20.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don’t care if they own Chrome. Force them to sell their advertising business.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 48 minutes ago

My gut says this is a play for elon to buy it to clamp down on communication

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Monopoly on harming consumers complaints that they may harm consumers if they don't have an monopoly on harming consumers.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 hours ago
  1. Divest android to a new corporation in a tax haven
  2. “license” android to google for more money than they make from selling phones
  3. write loss off in tax

the starbucks model

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So I don't get how this addresses the anti trust issues... So Google doesn't own the browser, won't they still make deals to be the default search engine across all devices? Don't they still manipulate search results to benefit themselves and their ad revenue above the quality of their search results?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

I don't know if this is part of the case, but browsers basically control standards, and with the size of chrome, that means google controls the standards. The browser is a big aspect of the ad pipeline. Because they have the browser they could direct page views to themselves more than they do by using amp links. Even with blocking cookies and such, chrome still sends data back to google. There was the whole logon scheme they were pushing (I don't remember the name) that only chrome would be able to do. There is a lot you can direct to yourself if you control the main access method.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago

Yes, I'm sure that someone else will want to buy Google's loss leader, Chrome, so they too can spend a bunch of money to get sued.

It would make more sense and be more effective to require them to spin off DoubleClick/display ads.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I've been boycotting Chrome for years; I don't understand how it's still a thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Many mobile apps are just stripped-down web browsers hard coded to only access one website. Most of those type of app are built on Chromium.

It's embedded in every smart TV and most other IoT devices that require some kind of web interface.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's the most popular browser by usage rate around the world.

So tech companies build for it.

And people use it because that's what works.

Because it's the most popular browser by usage rate in the world.

So tech companies build for it...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

But... I don't use it!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Personally? Gotta use it at work. I don't at home.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Oh yeah, me too. I forgot about that.