this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
108 points (98.2% liked)

News

23655 readers
3078 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Contrary to many predictions, abortions did not decline nationally after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Instead, U.S. abortion rates rose in 2023, surpassing 1 million, driven by expanded access to abortion pills and increased out-of-state travel.

Telemedicine policies, donations, and shield laws protecting providers enabled medication abortions to account for 63% of all abortions.

However, low-income women of color face significant barriers.

Advocates fear restrictions under a Trump administration, including tighter FDA rules on abortion pills or enforcement of the Comstock Act.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly, I'm willing to bet that early-term abortions have risen when possible at least somewhat because women understand there's a risk that if they miscarry or have other complications later into the term, doctors might be forced to endanger their lives in order to comply with christofascist nonsense. That is to say that pregnancies are now riskier to have thanks to these ridiculous, misogynist, theo-Nazi fucks.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

System works as designed. They get to kill women and make life harder for minorities. And it'll provide them with a pretext for further repression once they take power. Gotta save those babies!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I appreciate the article saying "contrary to predictions" rather than "despite the overturning" as in the summary. Because anyone with any sense knew it would pan out this way. The summary wording sounds as it would be logical to assume the bans would result in fewer abortions. The article wording correctly allows that it's the predictors (those pushing the forced-birth agenda) who were wrong.

Make pregnancy even more dangerous and force knowledgeable OBGYNs to abandon your state? Spur the sympathy of women throughout the land and the mobilization of pro-choice "auntie networks" who may never have understood the plight of poor women without access to care before? And do it in a pandemic-altered economy where remotely-accessed products and healthcare have become routine?

Classic FAFO.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

“Contrary to predictions” instead makes sense. I've updated the summary.