this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
643 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

11287 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Maybe it desintegrated and thus vanished from the consecutive frame?

Atomic blasts are kind of powerful versus an iron lid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Man. I haven't seen an ifunny logo in so long. Are people still on it?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Definitely easier to read thx

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

ifunny.c😀

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The Parker Solar Probe moves 120 miles per second as it passes around the Sun. That's nearly half a million miles per hour!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Parker Solar Probe: 191 km per second.

Nuclear Manhole Cover: 55 km per second

Voyager 1: 17 km per second

Voyager 2: 15 km per second

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nope, it would just have bursted due to thermal schock and pressure. Escape velocity, what are you dreaming, is the lid made of tungsten?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is the origin apparently.

RRB: "My calculations are irrelevant on this point. They are only valid in speaking of the shock reflection." Ogle: "How fast did it go?" RRB: "Those numbers are meaningless. I have only a vacuum above the cap. No air, no gravity, no real material strengths in the iron cap. Effectively the cap is just loose, traveling through meaningless space." Ogle: And how fast is it going?" This last question was more of a shout. Bill liked to have a direct answer to each one of his questions. RRB: "Six times the escape velocity from the earth."

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Ummm, not sure where they got these numbers from but Earth's escape velocity is not 7000mph and escaping the sun's gravitational pull (leaving the solar system from Earth) is not 30,000mph. Respectively the numbers are approximately 25,000mph and 94,000mph. You're welcome.

[–] stephen01king 1 points 6 hours ago

94000mph is relative to the sun's surface. Relative to the Earth's surface, it is around 37000mph, which means they were still wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's 11.2 km/s and 42.1 km/s.

Also, even if the manhole cover was going at above 12 km/s the trajectory has to be right for that to result in orbit. Most paths it would take would result in it going up and then coming back down again. Similarly, if somehow it did manage more than 50 km/s and wasn't destroyed in the atmosphere, it might have the velocity to escape the sun's gravity, but probably wouldn't be on the right path to do it. Most likely it would fall into the sun.

So, assuming the 125,000 mph (55 km/s) velocity is correct, the most likely outcome is that it was a reverse-meteor, something that burned up going up through the atmosphere, not down. And even if it did have enough speed to get out of the atmosphere, and there was enough of it left, it most likely fell right back down through the atmosphere somewhere else, either burning up on re-entry or hitting the ground (or the water) somewhere else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ignoring that it burned up and ignoring losses due to drag if it somehow didn't. Isn't the point of escape velocity that it explicitly won't come back down.iar least not on earth. Your trajectory won't matter as you have enough velocity to escape the gravity of earth and will orbit the sun. Further if you managed the solar system escape velocity you will end up orbiting the galactic core. Trajectory doesn't matter if you have escape velocity. Correct trajectory just minimizes the delta v needed to reach that escape velocity.

At least that's all my recollection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Escape velocity means you could stay in orbit. It doesn't guarantee anything if you launch at the wrong angle.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Gotta love Tumblr. Just massive amounts of disinformation and bullshit all the time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Surprised no one has posted this but Kyle hill made a video on it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

How to solve the Three Body Problem.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 2 days ago (7 children)

This reminds me of that quote from Mass Effect:

"This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class Dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means: Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space! (...) I dare to assume you ignorant jackasses know that space is empty! Once you fire this hunk of metal, it keeps going 'till it hits something! That can be a ship, or the planet behind that ship. It might go off into deep space and hit somebody else in ten thousand years. If you pull the trigger on this, you are ruining someone's day, somewhere and sometime!"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 days ago (6 children)

There is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it's minimum speed.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Ive seen this claim a dozen times. It’s a disc shape. How this thing isn’t going to start flipping and curving its trajectory, or just plain old running out of energy due to air resistance, and not making it out of earth’s atmosphere is beyond me.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Most likely it just evaporated, or disintegrated or something, but I think its pretty unlikely it survived that absolutely bonkers acceleration.

load more comments
view more: next ›