Well I was trying to find one thing that was exactly the same. The ground is level in the top photo. The curve in the curb is different. One building has a step down in the doorway, but not the other. The wall between the two buildings appears to be wider in one photo. I'm not saying it isn't, I'm just saying as far as I'm concerned, it could just be two very similar structures at two different times.

There are so many problems with that article it isn't even funny.

Here are a few:

1. It references the UK. The US and China are the biggest polluters. Meaning most cars are charged using fossil fuels and coal.
2. The article states it is a challenge to convert the DC from the car to the AC if the grid.
3. It seems to completely forget that a car has to be charged before it can discharge. The author seems to think thinking can solve it all.
4. A car that is used to charge the grid is LOSING the charge it needs to drive, which is the primary purpose of the car.
5. No matter how you slice it, some car owners simply can't use an electric vehicle. People who live in apartments for instance.

The answer isn't electric cars. The answer is LESS cars.

Doesn't look like the same place to me. More like two similar pictures of different places.

Power grids are failing. Sounds like a great time to add millions of EVs, to the mix.

Some places DO offer to take you somewhere, which is super cool. But face it, to take you back home and then bring you back again when the car is finished is cost prohibitive for a normal shop. They would have to have at least one extra vehicle to do this, a dedicated driver and insurance to cover what is essentially a completely separate service. They are a car repair service, not a shuttle service.

If you don't currently own an EV, why not ease into it with a plug in hybrid. Personally, I think it's more practical right now.

Because they didn't want to throw THEMSELVES out a window?

Man I have the same problem. Definitely mildly infuriating.

And as I understand it, they SCOTUS get to decide what counts as official. So theoretically, they could decide, for example, that killing a political opponent is official. After all someone who disagrees might effect the smooth running of the government. And so on.

Am I the only one not seeing 26 landed here?

But that's better than nothing, right?

Correction, 50% of VOTING Americans are fascist. It's the only thing that keeps me going.