this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

273 readers
35 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Man, if the government keeps going down that road, it's going to be pure chaos on the internet. Service providers are going to get sued left and right, and some businesses will just not be viable if they have to moderate everything that happens on their platforms.

Are they going to go after the email provider for Backpage next?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

lol section 230 shouldn't be relevant.

Because they didn't do anything to be liable for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

It’s the fifth circuit. My guess is that they just saw that it had something to do with sex work, one of the judges bellowed “PORNO BAD” and they all collapsed into a fit of angry jabbering like a crowd of townies in a South Park cartoon, and all these coherent legal words came out of some clerk who had to fix up the language later on new pages that weren’t flecked with anger-spittle. What the laws say and what makes sense are mostly irrelevant to the fifth circuit.