this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
48 points (98.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1631 readers
43 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is great news, it should hopefully mean we can stand up to China with less concern for the damage they could do via sanctions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know why you think this is an either or situation.

We will continue to trade with both and all countries that want to buy our stuff including disgusting ones like Saudi Arabia, Israel etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say it was an either or situation, that happened entirely in your head.

China have a long history of coercing countries via trade restrictions, most notably in Australia recently.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by coercing via trade restrictions? Can you give an example?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait.

Are you saying imposing sanctions is evil? That we should not trade with any nation that imposes sanctions?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely interested in how you reached that conclusion.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the link you sent me about how evil china is said they imposed sanctions so obviously you think any nation which imposes sanctions is evil and we should stop trading with them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it is indeed fascinating when people don't read the articles they send you as links.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have a very unique way of viewing the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think actually reading the article somebody sends you is very unique. Why do you think it is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you assume I hadn't read the article? Or that the information therein was news to me?

The fact that the lesson you took from that was "all sanctions are evil" is... Interesting logic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you assume I hadn’t read the article? Or that the information therein was news to me?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You gonna finish that sentence?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you assume I hadn’t read the article? Or that the information therein was news to me?

No I assumed you read it but after your replies it became clear that you hadn't read it.

The fact that the lesson you took from that was “all sanctions are evil” is… Interesting logic.

You said we should stop trading with China because of reasons. I asked for those reasons and you linked to the article. The article said they placed sanctions. Therefore it's logical to assume you want to stop trading with any country that imposes sanctions.

Or maybe I should just assume that your reasons have nothing to do with economic issues or sanctions or whatever. Maybe I should assume it comes from a place of ignorance and bigotry. This far into the conversation that seems like a more likely reason you want to trade with other nations that impose sanctions but want to stop trading with china because it imposes sanctions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Therefore it's logical to assume you want to stop trading with any country that imposes sanctions.

Fascinating. Do you know how many countries have imposed sanctions on some other country?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fascinating. Do you know how many countries have imposed sanctions on some other country?

A lot.

I suppose you think we should stop trading with all of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, do I?

This has been a fascinating exchange, but not quite the look into your mind I had hoped for.

Now, tell me, do you think the reasons for China enacting sanctions are reasonable ones?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This has been a fascinating exchange, but not quite the look into your mind I had hoped for.

What an odd statement to make. I guess it bothers you to be confronted by your own shortcomings.

Now, tell me, do you think the reasons for China enacting sanctions are reasonable ones?

Yes of course they are reasonable. Every country enacts sanctions in order to further their own aims and to gain an advantage in geopolitics and economics. They did it for the same reason we sanction countries. To get what we want, to win, to make money.

Of course some countries like the USA also impose sanctions because they are sadistic and enjoy watching their enemies suffer. For example the sanctions in Iraq were the cause of 250,000 deaths of civilians and the then secretary of state said that it was perfectly just and moral.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes of course they are reasonable.

Sanctions in response to an investigation into the origins and spread of Covid are, in your mind, no less valid than, for example, sanctioning Russia over their invasion of Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sanctions in response to an investigation into the origins and spread of Covid are, in your mind, no less valid than, for example, sanctioning Russia over their invasion of Ukraine?

Yes the reason is the same. Hurt your enemies, benefit yourself. That's geopolitics. That's the same reason we sanction other countries. We want to hurt them and we want to benefit ourselves.

BTW the sanctions on Iraq were because some Saudis flew into a building in NY.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time will tell how this plays out, but overall I think this is a good thing. IMHO NZ needs to diversify its export portfolio, so to speak, and be less reliant on a single large market (i.e. China). This should lead to more economic resilience, which can only be a good thing in this fairly volatile time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish it didn't modify our copyright term. +50 to +70 years is a real shame. :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, does it? That's not mentioned in the article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great for NZ economically. Ambivalent for everyday Kiwis and I suspect detrimental long term to our already abused whenua. Seeing great swathes of South Canterbury etc being force fed fertiliser to grow grass to grow cows to make milk to export just doesn't seem like the 'right' thing to be doing. And this agreement just makes that econmically more viable for the dairy cartel.

My 2c at least :/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I know a lot of people very dislike GMOs but I think if we used them properly we could really reduce the need for water and fertilizer in the dairy and beef industries. Which would be good because we live in a capitalist world regardless if we want to or not.

load more comments
view more: next ›