this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
864 points (97.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32570 readers
129 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Source: https://xkcd.com/927/.

Not posting with alternative text is like missing half of the xkcd.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wow, somehow this escaped me all these years. I feel like I’ve got a bunch of fresh XKCD to read now.

For the uneducated: On a mobile browser you just press and hold the comic (long tap). On a computer you hover over the image and the alt text will appear next to the cursor.

The alt text in this one was:

spoilerFortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

One of my favorites

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wasn't the standard USB-C? Maybe we should just create the Universal USB, the U-USB.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

With their naming standards, it would probably be called "U^2SB, Universal Super Fast Serial Bus"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's USB-C.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This of course ignores all the other times a new common standard succeeded

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't that almost always require a significant government intervention/regulation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Phone and laptop chargers converged from numerous standards to just a few all on their own I think, no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, but under treath of lawmakers mandating a single standard. And the EU has now forced a single standard anyway on smartphones, tablets, etc.

Although I agree that there are quite a few examples of a "naturally emerging" single standards without lawmaker intervention, but this is not really one of them...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, in such a situation you should always try to compare the standards, look at the userbases and suddenly there are only very few that actually make sense. If everyone just does this, one standard will eventually crystalise as the one to use (or at least depending on the situation). Character encoding is an interesting example, because nowadays (almost) everything just uses UTF-8, despite there having been many.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

UTF-8 is absolutely magical in how it's backwards compatible with ASCII. Windows still uses UTF-16 which makes supporting Unicode filenames and stuff a huge pain compared to linux. At least pretty much the entire web is UTF-8.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the reason I was super hyped by the synergy of the fediverse, all the support and use of activity pub. And god I hope Facebook doesn't ruin it. This community has grown so rapidly and organically, I just wanna see it continue to thrive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Ahh this was the one they talked about on the WAN show

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I finally got a proper USB 3.012542 cable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's bad when the actual naming scheme is more ridiculous. See USB 3.2 gen 2x1. Hopefully usb 4 simplifies things, but let's be honest, it probably won't...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You should have just linked to the page. It would have embedded the image, right?

load more comments
view more: next ›