this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
412 points (97.9% liked)

Ukraine

8192 readers
353 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the proper term for these are anti-materiel rifle. Made for stopping vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...it says that in the title

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The title was edited between my post & yours I guess.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Fair enough I didn't notice that

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

I like the plan, and it looks good, but I just feel that dual wielding them may not work.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Are those massive silencers on the end or something else?

Never seen a rifle that large before.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Could also be massive muzzle brakes. That rifle must kick like a horse on five different kinds of steroids.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A muzzle brake is not a closed cylinder. There would also be no reason to make it that long.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

yeah, I'm European, I don't know shit about guns

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since we're all going off what is visible and nothing more: the outer bits seem to be fabric, maybe those are dirt covers?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Suppressors tend to get very hot very quickly. This produces a mirage effect when looking through the scope. Wraps made of high temperature materials help mitigate that and also allow the shooter to remove the suppressor without having to wait until it cools down.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are suppressors (a.k.a. silencers). They work just like your car's muffler and both were invented by the same guy: the grandson of the inventor of the Maxim machine gun.

It will certainly not make these monster guns movie-quiet but it reduces their massive sound and flash signature making it harder to locate where they were shot from.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flash suppressors. Snipers are very high-value targets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Flash hiders maybe? Idk

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Certainly looks that way. As if it wasn't big enough already. In most pictures I have seen they have only muzzle brakes, but in some they clearly have suppressors. A useful side-effect may be to reduce the visible muzzle fire for night operation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

weight — 6.9 kg

That's quite a suppressor.

Compare to an M4 carbine, the current US issue rifle (not a suppressor on an M4, but the whole weapon):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_carbine

6.43 lb (2.92 kg) empty[4]

7.75 lb (3.52 kg) with 30 rounds and sling

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this is how you get Americans back interested in helping Ukraine. Girl with ridiculously big guns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Those things conveniently double as a flag pole at a rural Ford dealership.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's clearly not interested in dudes packing pistols.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

For when you need to kill a whole company standing in a line

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That thing looks like it can cause some serious damage, even to things that are relatively well hardened.

Like, what would happen if a sniper fired that gun into the barrel of a T-80 that had an HE shell loaded?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't have to hit the barrels they usually aim for weak spots hoping for penetration then the round bounces around inside taking everyone out.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anti-material rifles were initially designed to take out tanks. However all modern tanks have thick enough armor to deflect its bullets.

Now APC's, trucks, vans, and most engines and electronics are destroyed by these rounds. Hence the anti-material label now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Given some of the antique tanks the Russians pulled out of the moth ball heap, it might still be an anti-tank-weapon occasionally ...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Would it be possible to ruin the barrel by shooting at it from the side? Or would it just ricochet?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The barrel is thicker than the armor on tanks. Usually they weigh in at over 2 tons of steel. The circular shape also makes it very likely to deflect the impact like sloped armor.

It might make a little ding in the paint.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They are designed to withstand huge pressures while maintaining their structure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be hard to get the angle just right to get the bullet all the way down the barrel without it impacting the sides of the barrel

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Bullets are deflected along surprisingly sharp bends in a barrel (or any other pipe), so it would be sufficient to hit the tank gun muzzle roughly from the front, and it would probably hit a loaded projectile.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically, it would be sufficient of they lodge a bullet into the barrel. As soon as the tank fires, the bullet will wedge between the shell and the barrel, destroying - at least - the barrel.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

You'd have to be pretty lucky for a bullet to enter from the front in a way that it wouldn't just get blown back out by the shockwave before the shell reaches it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Kaboom, I believe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I want one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Alucard in the background police girl!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Those would be overkill if you went blue whale hunting. Yikes haha

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I always wanted to shoot the Halo sniper rifle

load more comments
view more: next ›