this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
40 points (95.5% liked)

Formula 1

8921 readers
74 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโ€™t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 23-25 Aug
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 30 Aug-01 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 13-15 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 20-22 Sep
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 18-20 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 25-27 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 01-03 Nov
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 21-23 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The same sentiment a lot of people here seemed to show. But I imagine the reaction might be a bit different this time.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Checking the other Ferrari and Merc cars should have been the bare minimum imo. Fair enough checking all the cars might have taken a bit more time, but not that much. I think it was Chris Medland that was saying the teams themselves take 30 seconds to check their own plank wear.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

The risk is that if the car has gone back to the team they could have changed something (intentionally or unintentionally), this is why cars are not released to the team if they are being scrutinized in this way.

It's more critical with things like fuel levels but its the reason they didn't.l as teams can't start packing down properly till the cars are made ready for transport and they can't do that if they held by the FIA

However on a personal level I would have liked at least one car per team checked.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

If times a concern, they could possibly cut down the time by only checking the areas on the teammates where the first cars were found to be infringing, so in last weeks case the board wear.

Sure, a single team could intentionally break the rules using different methods, but intentionally doing so runs a high risk one of the two cars is selected for review and disqualifications not a light penalty, even if it only gets caught on the one car. For a situation like last week where thereโ€™s no real indication there was malicious intent, checking just the board of the second car would cover the scenario where the same setup mistakes is being applied to both cars.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

If only 50% of the test sample passes, that should be enough to have every car evaluated

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

That's true. It was a mistake that they didn't do the check right after they finished. By the time they realised half of the tested cars were illegal, most of the other cars were already in parts and on the way to Mexico