this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Women

813 readers
1 users here now

A place for discussion, camaraderie, and advice.

For, from, and with women. Hi 👋

RULES:

--Be good to one another.

If you're not sure about what you're about to type, ask yourself: Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?

--About, but not only for, women.

We are here to talk about, learn about, and wonder about women and their/our experiences. Men are allowed to post here, but only for the purpose of asking sincere questions about women or for advice related to a women in their lives they are trying to support.

--No bullies. No Creeps. No trolls.

No personal attacks, no misogyny, no misandry, ageism, racism, or otherwise hateful or disrespectful commentary.

--No selling products or services.

You can recommend products/methods that work for you, but soliciting clients or patients is not allowed. No advertising or self-promotions, including using this sub to drive traffic elsewhere.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, we’ve had cars for a long time….but finally we’ll be testing them for safety for women, too.

In a sea of bad news, today this got me excited.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From the article they cite at the top in an effort to claim that crash tests since the 1960's have only used male dummies.... ”GM also needed a test device to simulate a small female for testing of driver airbags. In 1987, GM transferred the Hybrid III technology to a dummy representing a 5th percentile female."

Not saying that a true representation of the female body isn't needed, just that this specific article is hyperbolic in its wording and is misconstruing it's sources to produce a desired narrative. Maybe best to find articles with a more nuanced, fact based reporting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I listened to a podcast episode about this, I believe it was 99% Invisible. The female dummies that have been used in the past are basically just scaled down males. That's not exactly ideal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It honestly boggles my mind that in 2023 there are still no mandatory crash tests required for the female form.

Additionally, I drive a lot of hire cars and it’s shocking how many makes/models’ seatbelts would effectively garrotte me if I were to crash while driving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A lot of things are still designed with men in mind unfortunately. Drug trials, car safety testing, ac systems, mental health systems etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ok I'll put this another way, the mental health of both men and women is compromised by sexism. Women are underdiagnosed with neural diversity like autism and adhd and disproportionately diagnosed with mood disorders. The prevalence of "men dont cry or show emotion/weakness" sexism results in men not seeking or receiving the care and support needed.

But sure, lets all pretend the system is fine and not broken from every direction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They didn't say mental health improvement systems *taps forehead*

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Ah, so it works by design. I see, I see.