this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
59 points (96.8% liked)

Interesting Shares

1058 readers
169 users here now

Share interesting articles, projects, research, pictures, or videos.


Please include a prefix in your title!


Prefixes for posts

Certain clients offer filters to make prefixes searchable. Photon (m.lemmy.zip) used for hyperlinks below:


Icon attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pesticides used in our homes, gardens and lawns and sprayed on foods we eat are contributing to a dramatic decline in sperm count among men worldwide, according to a new analysis of studies over the last 50 years.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. We need less people anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had the same thought: the earth is already overpopulated. It's not sustainable to have 8 billion people on this planet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah we need to go back to 3 billion, and stop listening to people that cry about aging population and there being less people... They are just idiots or people that want super cheap labor.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They want someone to pay for their retirement pension with taxes (if they were employees) or cheap labour if they are employers. Totally agree about all natality musings being idiotic nonsense. Mother nature is helping us with infertility, the ecosystem regulates itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just hand out lots of Drugs of all sorts to people going into retirement...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Yay!

Non-existent people are so much happier. \•__•\

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is reduced sperm count a bad thing at this point in time? Didn’t we just pass the 8 billion mark in Earth’s population recently? We could probably stand to reduce the population gain for a bit.

[–] BrikoX 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Theoretically, but if the population falls from current numbers, the life quality will fall too because smaller number of working age people will have to support a higher population of retired people. That puts an enormous burden on young generations and strains the economy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

working age people will have to support a higher population of retired people

Will we though? Will we have to?

Or might we just set their gophers on an ice floe from the arctic ice sheets they helped to melt and nudge them off into the ocean?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Life's a pyramid scheme where you screw over the next generation by instilling a sense of duty in them to the ones that brought them here, in a non-consensual quid-pro-quo. 'You were given this gift of life so you must take care of those that gave you this gift'.

Then, of course, in order to keep it going, they themselves do the same, lest they end up holding the bag. Fun fact - some nations had titles like 'hero mothers' for people that had 3+ children.

Though, I'd say that it isn't really fair to collectively punish all retirees as they were also forced into this system by the ones before them and some may have chosen to not participate in it by increasing the population count further.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It conflicts with growth at all cost economic systems which obviously are sustainable forever.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

So Children of Men was a prophecy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

plants will have their revenge in the long run!