this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
397 points (85.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26849 readers
4021 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Before you all get your panties in a twist, I know it's technically not true.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That link is an unsourced opinion piece on a site belonging to something called the Adam Smith Institute. I'm gonna need something a bit more credible before I believe it tbh.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The Adam smith institute is a right wing free market think tank with likely very questionable donors. wiki It likely doesn't really do research but takes sources that support their preexisting believes and retells them.

Certainly it was at least very hard to make the capitalist exploitation of the worker so all encompassing before the invention of the mechanical watch (Although there was likely a ton of housework and the general situation was garbage what with feudal lords and all that) . It then likely exploded with the industrial revolution and at least in places where the working class managed to emancipate themselves got somewhat cut back. Now especially for countries outside of the west and increasingly also the US and parts of EU it's likely getting worse, especially with multi employment and precarious employment(gig work, semi self employment, 0h contracts, mechanical turk ...).

Generally i feel work where you or your peers get to keep the total output of your work isn't really a problem, it's a problem when your work gets appropriated into this terrible machine and as a result you are alienated from the work.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Adam Smith Institute

I always find it kinda funny when the right turns to Adam Smith. Smith thought that the free market would free us from the monopolistic tendencies of the mercantile system. (Although he wouldn't have written it as such, as the term 'monopoly' wasn't nearly as taxonomically precise as it is now.) If he was alive today, he'd probably be rather dismayed at the failures of capitalism.

But then again, I guess that's the right's shtick: coopt any idea that they can and pervert it to benefit the ultra-wealthy.

Anyways, here's Smith:

The object, besides, of the greater part of the bye-laws of all regulated companies, as well as of all other corporations, is not so much to oppress those who are already members, as to discourage others from becoming so; which may be done, not only by a high fine, but by many other contrivances. The constant view of such companies is always to raise the rate of their own profit as high as they can; to keep the market, both for the goods which they export, and for those which they import, as much understocked as they can: which can be done only by restraining the competition, or by discouraging new adventurers from entering into the trade. (The Wealth of Nations V.i.e.10)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It would be funny if it weren't so sad. As much as reading and understanding smith and other philosophy is important for the individual, think tanks unfortunately seem necessary in a modern context aiming to transform, often quite unreadable, as your excerpt demonstrates, philosophical learning, into applicable law/policy.

As with everything this process is utterly captured by right wing and market fundamentalist interests. Just sort this list by Bias/Affiliation and skim some of the descriptions it's a bit horrific, but it also might save you from reading an old school stochastic parrot with an inhumane agenda. Or if you actually find one you can agree with it might give you a reasonable first source.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There's also the materialist take on capitalism that it's a stage between feudalism and a more socialist or communist organization of society.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If that's ok too, I have read a book by an anthropologist who claims the opposite (that in fact people in the past had more leisure than today). I can look up a good quote tomorrow. For the claim in the post, I'm afraid, there ain't no good sources, as for most alternative facts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean it seems like the sort of thing people are just ready to believe because "we have technology now so we must have better lives" despite loads of that technology being turned towards controlling us.

As for the book, it wouldn't be Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber, would it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was the first book I read by Graeber but not the last one. He mentioned it in other books too but yes, I was about to quote from Bullshit Jobs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Anyone wanting to read it can do so for free: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-bullshit-jobs

The official version I think is better formatted, but this one is functional if you can't access the official one for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's historical consensus. Your quality of life is still better because you have civil rights and access to medical care that actually works.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (16 children)

If it's consensus then there must be sources somewhere.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Medieval peasant's idea of luxury was also "some butter". Let's not glorify the past.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They loved showing off what spices they had, like "yo this is a nutmeg pie, that's right I got nutmeg bitches." Some of the recipes are actually hilarious cause they seem to be based around showing off your spices, the original lasagna for example.

What's also funny is the foods peasants could afford and eat, were at least to our modern diet a lot healthier than what the lord would eat. They'd be eating root vegetables, cabbage, squash, porridges. Cheese as well because it was a method of preservation and the separated whey had it's own uses, lot of peasants made their own cheese. Meanwhile the lord would be eating marrow and fatty salted meats, hunting his own game, or more like wanting people to believe he did so trying to curate that image of himself. Maybe commission a "morning hunt" portrait of himself in case you weren't sure.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

More time off to take care of the fourteen children you need to have to keep your farm going.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

And almost succumb to some form of the common cold

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You'd be having sex in the same room as all your kids and animals lived too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If one dies, I'll just pop another out, right in the field. Cut the cord, and he can get to work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There was a much higher likelihood of dying during childbirth too.

Families with more than 4 or 5 children were almost certainly blended families.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Redditors thinking that having time off as some dirt fucking poor peasant in the Medieval Era is all fun and games.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least ye'd probably get to eat yer daily porridge next to a fuckin' goose. May not be your goose, or the village goose, but a fine goose and an important part of peasantry nonetheless. Better than serfs get.. Eatin' their porridge next to a mule and a rake.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dies at 46 after a minor cut gets infected

[–] balderdash9 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You don't want to go back to the past. At least not before germ theory and anesthesia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Nothing wrong with some whiskey and biting down on a stick when you need your leg amputated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there were no cameras in the Middle Ages. Checkmate shitposters.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Also that woman clearly isn't middle aged.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

It's still bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a recent report (rather exagerrated but still) which claimed that in the 1930s it took 65 hours of human labour a week to run a household. Today it takes 3. Things were worse back in medieval days.

Doubt.jpeg

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Actually medieval people got wayyy more time off across the board. It's because they all died by 45.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can't wait for people in debate class to look at this post and discuss which logical fallacy is most fitting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Or how is just blatantly wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's holiday season, we got pies and ale, a new preacher is coming to town and we're getting shitfaced. Nobody has plague yet and life is good.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OP I thought debunking the Adam Smith Institute claim would be easy, but you've just introduced me to Tim Worstall and he might be based: We Can afford UBI, and its better than the cruel welfare state - Tim Worstall

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's a great read, thanks for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I already work less than a medieval peasant.

Just don't tell my boss.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do too. My boss is an asshole though, spends all her time on lemmy shitposting and then tells me to work harder. But then again, I am my own boss, so PEBCAK.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No way in fucking hell it takes 3 hours a week to run a household. I do that daily.

Clothing, kids homework, meals to cook, cleaning, shopping for food, kids extracurriculars, bills.

6:00 pick up kids from aftercare

6:15 Get home with kids, take care of pets, reheat dinner

6:30-7:00 kids eat dinner and I do laundry

7:00-8:00 kids homework and cleaning

8:00-8:30: violin practice

8:30 - 9:00 whatever subject they are lagging in or if nothing shared reading.

9:00 - 10:00 kids bath and ready for next day. Around 9:20 or so I eat dinner

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You also do it alone.

People generally used to live with their extended families.

The tasks you're describing were generally spread out between 4-8 grown-ass adults.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A medieval peasant looked nothing like this.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I sincerely apologize for the historical inaccuracies contained in this shitpost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know about others, but I know many Spanish colonies only worked 4-hours a day up to the 1890s. It could be tradition, and also unlike other Western powers at the time, Spain had not industrialised as much and would still have to rely much on physical labour. So I think the combination of Spain and its colonies being too hot to work for long periods, and lack of industrialisation, made 4 hour day work the way of life for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›