Controlled opposition. Force a weak claim on a legitimate issue through the court. When the court rejects it on procedural grounds, now there is precedent.
Source: my ass
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
80 points (98.8% liked)
Statecraft
174 readers
14 users here now
- URL has to point to the actual article
- Body has to have an archive link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I think the precedent is only set when a case is won. At least that was my impression as a non-USer.
I could be mistaken, and I look forward to being corrected by someone who knows for sure.
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
du Pont de Nemours and Co and other manufacturers of toxic so-called "forever chemicals" a big win in their fight against legal liability for the substances, rejecting a lower court's ruling that would have allowed about 11.8 million Ohio residents to sue the companies as a group.
Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a lower court's approval of the massive class action, which included virtually every resident of Ohio and put considerable legal pressure on the chemical manufacturers to settle the plaintiffs' claims.
The chemicals are used in a wide range of consumer products including non-stick pans and clothing and have been tied to cancer and other diseases.
The lawsuit also sought to establish a fund to monitor Ohio residents for health impacts from PFAS exposure.
Robert Bilott, an attorney for Hardwick, said the court's decision runs "counter to what we know about the history of manufacturing of PFAS in the United States" and said they are evaluating whether to appeal.
3M agreed in June to pay $10.3 billion to settle hundreds of claims the company polluted public drinking water with the chemicals, while Chemours Co (CC.N), DuPont de Nemours Inc (DD.N) and Corteva reached a similar deal with U.S. water providers for $1.19 billion.
Saved 55% of original text.