this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35473 readers
412 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Someone forgot that bike lanes should actually have space for a bike. And maybe not cobblestones.

Legally, combined footpath/bike lanes over here should have a minimum width of 2.3m. Between line and tree there is less than 0.8m.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking millennials, first there's too few trees, now there's too many, can't make up their minds, can they. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Leave the tree, remove the road.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Based fediverse comment section

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most bike lane planners just assume that we can teleport through trees

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Get a load of this guy who doesn't have a quantum bike pssh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If I could teleport, I wouldn't bike ;)

Yeah, bike paths always have least priority. Their main point is to show up in the "Our city has X kilometers of bike path" statistic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think I've gotten at the root of the problem

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is not mildly infuriating. This is extremely infuriating. But at least you have bike lanes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is just bike lanes in general, it feels like they're just painted in randomly to shut people up, except they're just not practically useful.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is US bike lanes in a nutshell

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

US bike lanes in a nutshell is really more just a picture of a road shoulder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Engineers love painted bike lanes because they are shoulders/“recovery zones” for cars, but they can sell them as bike infrastructure

insert go ahead, die meme here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

People park their cars in the bike lanes here 🤬

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thunderdome. Two enter, one leaves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watch it or the tree puns might take root

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That was low hanging fruit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Two nuns are riding their bikes back to the convent:

Nun1 looks around at the scenery and says "Strange, I've never come this way before"

Nun2 replies, "yeah, it's the cobblestones"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I spit out my coffee

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Still better than anything in my area

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, seems bout right and normal for a govt-effected job...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the always terrible and shabby government funded bike infrastructure... https://www.wired.com/2014/08/copenhagens-new-bike-skyway-makes-commuting-look-fun/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not sure about that. This path was built in 1967. Could be they planted some slim trees and forgot that trees tend to grow.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I refuse to bike on this kind of lane. I just bike on the road, f that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

To shreds you say?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have many of these where I live. The worst part is that the police will fine cyclists and scooter riders for riding on the road. So everyone is forced onto the sidewalk where scooters scoot between pensioners, kids, and mothers with strollers. What an idiotic backwards system. Peasants, give way to cars. Fudalistic mentality.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You live in the US I presume?

Here in Lyon, France, the local government is removing car lanes downtown so we get wider bike lanes. Some are not happy about it, but if you look at the number of people passing through at rush hour, cyclists really outnumber cars, and bike traffic is never jammed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You live in the US I presume?

Asia

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

my bad. I guess city and road planning is very car-centric as well.