this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3079 readers
177 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It was April of last year when Priti Patel headed to east Africa to make the case that the UK needed a new tool to drive down illegal immigration: the prospect of migrants being sent to Rwanda.

But here we are in the final month of 2023 and the policy isn't off the ground, even if plenty of airliners with politicians on have been.

This time the plan gets the fountain pen and cartridge paper treatment - a treaty, an agreement between two countries recognised internationally.

It is the latest attempt to shove the whole idea into a place where it actually works and escapes the crippling judgements of an array of courts.

A senior Labour figure who's been doing a spot of maths texts me: "It's one year, five months and 20 days almost to the hour since the first flight of asylum seekers was originally due to depart for Rwanda, before it was cancelled at the last minute.

James Cleverly will dash back home within seven or eight hours of arriving in Rwanda —and is expected in the Commons on Wednesday setting out the planned new law on the treaty.


The original article contains 412 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mub 2 points 11 months ago

Not sure it is the Clever!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

He should live there for a couple of years to prove to us all how safe it is.

He's got an office job, he can work from home and go to Zoom meetings. No need for him to physically be in the UK.