this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
579 points (95.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20464 readers
122 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
579
GIMP (credit to mrAnmolv) (lemmy.xylight.dev)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

pro-tip you can run gimp on WSL2 and have its xwindow appear within windows just like a normal application. The ONLY way to run gimp on windows imo.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/tutorials/gui-apps

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Edge for Linux in WSL lmao how many layers do we need

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

windows version of citra runing in wine in wsl emulating 3ds vc release?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's been a while since I've used GIMP, but I recall even loading it on Linux taking over a minute.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sometimes it does take a few seconds for me as well, but not even close to a full minute. That must’ve been on an HDD, right?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It's never taken more than like 2 seconds to open on any of my computers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It’s been a while, so it may have been on a HDD.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Takes a while for me on Linux too. No idea if it's longer on Windows

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Everything loads slower on Windows. I've run programs through fucking Wine that still load faster than they do on Windows.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Linux loads the gtk libs when your desktop starts because it's a major component of gnu/gnome. Windows doesn't until you launch an app that would use it. It's not a small library.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a small library.

it's featherweight compared to Windows Desktop, tho

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sure... But the point is that it's an apples to oranges compare when half of gimp is loaded by the OS at boot under Linux and at runtime on Windows.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Does Gimp load slowly for people who use KDE?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't use KDE any more so I don't follow closely. But it used to be significantly slower. I recall some years back they were working to change KDE loading of gtk libs but I'm not sure what came out of that

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Everything seems to be way faster on Linux than on windows for some reason.

On one occasion I tested a build that took ~10 min on windows, in a Linux VM installed on the same machine, it finished in ~1min.

I have searched around for an answer for quite some time now, I could not find any definitive reason. Some say that process creation is slower on windows, some say IO is inefficient. Still struggling to explain 10x increase in throughput.

Here is a funny instance: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/17783/why-does-emacs-take-longer-to-start-on-windows-than-on-linux

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO it's because Windows is targeted for general use so they don't bother optimizing anything. They'll just convince people that thei have aging hardware when things become slow and say stuffs like "unused RAM is wasted RAM" to justify taking up half of my memory on idle.

Even running Linux from a USB is still a way smoother experience than running Windows for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I thinks it caused by two reasons:

  • process creation has much higher overhead on windows. On top of that, the antivirus system adds additional overhead not present in Linux because it scan every process on launch and monitor its behavior until the process finished. This result in any workflow that relies on launching a bunch of processes (e.g. make-style compilation which launch the compiler process recursively) to be very slow on Windows.
  • file access on windows is also significantly slower on windows due to its filesystem filter. Also, antivirus typically hook into this filter and inspect every opened files. You can imagine this would result in significant slowdown for any workflow that relies on opening a lot of small files (e.g. compilation)

If you disable the antivirus (including windows defender) performance would definitely improve, but it'll still slower than on Linux.

In order to gain sufficient performance in windows, you'll have to use threads instead of processes (basically a single program doing everything instead of chaining multiple program Unix-style) and put your data in a single file so it can load all at once instead of in a bunch of small files loaded recursively. Basically a complete opposite of what people do on Linux.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

for some reason.

bloat

I ran Atlus for a second before installing PopOS and Windows can be just as fast if you remove literally everything

Atlus suffers from the fact that it's still just windows though so all the underlying issues are still there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What specs do you have that makes GIMP load in 2 milliseconds?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously it's an exaggeration, takes about 2 seconds for me

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just tested it, something between 1 and 2 seconds for me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just switched to linux it is incomparably faster. I just deleted the built in paint program because it is useless, way easier to just load gimp in 1 second. Libreoffice is also faster, although not that much faster.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Libreoffice is heavy, still loads much faster than MS Office tho

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He is using arch

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Wait, so are people going to claim that the start-up speed is the problem with GIMP on Windows and not the god awful UI? This is the problem with the Linux crowd. You guys write software to write software and not because you are a user of that software. A clunky UI - which is far, far too common on open source applications - will cost someone a heck of a lot more than a few seconds in getting work done.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

There's alot of irritation and bad general assumptions here lol. Krita, vlc, firefox, kdenlive etc exist and are amazing.

Gimp's ui is pretty bad though imo, even if it's good enough. I'd pirate and use photoshop as it is now if I could.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it a bad UI? Or is it a case of "I know where this thing is in Photoshop. Why isn't it in the same place in GIMP?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a god awful UI. Throw Blender into that mix as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

wait people are supposed to use GIMP I think it was for that special level of hell for graphic designers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I tried to use GIMP when my PS sub ran out and I NEEDED to get some pics edited. Good GOD it took me way too long to get used to the workspace. Workflow was cut ion half, I guess that's a thing with any new program but it took me like maybe a minute to figure out Darktable when I switched from LR.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Credit to mrAnmolv

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Is the font system at it again?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyway to make it open faster on Mac?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I read forever ago that deleting plugins and brushes you don't use helps slightly. Can anyone confirm/deny?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Am I going crazy or something? Gimp loads in under 5 seconds on windows for me, and that's with an absurd amount of crap (unity, blender, a vm, and 400+ browser tabs across 5 browsers) running in the background.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me: Export this 256x256 PNG.

Gimp on windows: Bro, you'd better get a drink and a snack.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Same with emacs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Green Is My Pepper

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nope this is truth. even with SSD on my part

load more comments
view more: next ›