this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
45 points (73.7% liked)

Today I Learned (TIL)

461 readers
1 users here now

Rules
  1. Posts must begin with "TIL".
  2. Posts must be about a specific fact. No "TIL about [ducks]."

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This letter was written to the Editors of the New York Times Dec. 2, 1948 -- only months after the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel.

The letter was signed by Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, Sidney Hook, Jessurun Cardozo, Zellig Harris, Bruria Kaufman, Irma Lindheim, Seymour Melman, Fritz Rohrlich, Stefan Wolpe, and others.

TO THE EDITORS OF NEW YORK TIMES:

Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.

Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement.

The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.

Attack on Arab Village

A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants (240 men, women, and children) and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.

The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.

Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model.

During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.

The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.

Discrepancies Seen

The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.

In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.

The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.

ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ, HANNAH ARENDT, ABRAHAM BRICK, RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO, ALBERT EINSTEIN, HERMAN EISEN, M.D., HAYIM FINEMAN, M. GALLEN, M.D., H.H. HARRIS, ZELIG S. HARRIS, SIDNEY HOOK, FRED KARUSH, BRURIA KAUFMAN, IRMA L. LINDHEIM, NACHMAN MAISEL, SEYMOUR MELMAN, MYER D. MENDELSON, M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY, SAMUEL PITLICK, FRITZ ROHRLICH, LOUIS P. ROCKER, RUTH SAGIS, ITZHAK SANKOWSKY, I.J. SHOENBERG, SAMUEL SHUMAN, M. SINGER, IRMA WOLPE, STEFAN WOLPE.

New York, Dec. 2, 1948

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t he referring to a political party and not the country?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It just happens to be the political party that is currently in power in Israel.

What is a State but for the government in charge of it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What is a State but for the government in charge of it?

I feel like this conflates a bunch of different things.

Elected officials aren't the same as the government. Elected officials can try to do a bunch of stuff that is blocked by laws and bureaucracy.

When referring to a state, there's also the population. The people of a country often don't agree with the actions of their elected officials or bureaucrats. Referring to "Israel" in the title implies the population as well, but the letter is pretty specific about one party and (mostly) one politician.

In Canada, I think most Canadians would say that they weren't represented by either Trudeau or Harper (even if Canadians approve of some of their policies).

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No, a State is not its population that is subjected by its rule.

If I criticize Canada, then I'm not criticizing Canadians.

When the US commits war crimes and we condemn the United States, we are not condemning the people of the US. We are condemning the State who is actually responsible.

Rarely does a State do what the majority of its people want it to so, especially when it comes to foreign policy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If the government is a representative of the people of the country, wouldn’t the will of the government be the same as the will of the people. Further on, would critiquing the representative government be the same as critiquing the people of said country?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the people of Israel agree with what's happening in Gaza then I will criticize the people of Israel. It's that simple; a crime is a crime no matter who does it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But they don't. Some do, most don't.

Currently the ones who don't support the war are being jailed or fined or fired by the State. Just like what happened to many who opposed WW1 or currently Russians who oppose the war in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In that case there's no reason to criticize the Israeli people as a whole. The other guy's argument is only one of semantics, is what I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Agreed, we should criticize the State and those that support its war crimes, not all of the people living in the borders under the control of that State.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

No, because a government is rarely the representative of the people.

Most governments are plutocracies, so they're the representatives of the upper class, not the majority of the people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

When the US commits war crimes and we condemn the United States, we are not condemning the people of the US. We are condemning the State who is actually responsible.

From what I've seen, when criticizing actions of the US military, people will explicitly name the military, rather than saying "the United States" since that encompasses the people of the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So if Israel as a state is like the Nazis, you would say that Palestine is like ISIS? (And I suppose like the Nazis as well if you're so insistent on invoking Godwin's Law)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Godwin hates it when people do that. Don't do that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

You'd have to ask Einstein

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

The title is misleading. This was open criticism of a political party not the state of Israel. Einstein did not endorse the creation of Israel either.

The political party in question, Tnuat Haherut, was not in power at the time.

As a Labor Zionist, Einstein supported the Palestinian Jews of the Yishuv. However, he did not support the establishment of a Jewish state or an Arab state to replace the British Mandate for Palestine, instead asserting that he would "much rather see a reasonable agreement reached with the Arabs on the basis of living together in peace" under the framework of a binational Jewish–Arab state.

Einstein also rejected an offer to be the first President of Israel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

He compared a party there to nazis, not the country. Similar to how Republicans are like the nazis but not the whole US.