this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

12 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That's clearly shark lurking just beneath the surface. Maybe ask blahaj.zone?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Attack by a botnet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a source for the numbers in the image? Is it up to date or were they snapshots from something each day?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh; darn, now I need to know where they get their stats from.

Well I'll just say my dumb idea. It might not be this, but I observed that fedidb would double count instances for kbin. It was doing this for a while with fedia.io where it also listed www.fedia.io under it with the exact same MAU / user count. Not a big problem, but as I was checking in each day I noticed it suddenly added kbin.social under another subdomain as well, doubling all of its counts. Then, eventually, both dupes were removed. So my idea was maybe this was during that time when suddenly the largest instance was being double counted. Maybe not, just wanted to mention that I had seen that happen

Edit: I guess they get users themselves, so unless they had the same glitch, it was likely unrelated, my bad

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh nice, I didn't know about fedidb.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

similar situation like mastodon vs x.com

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm looking for why those dates in particular. Also, it's a spike that's very different from Lemmy.

load more comments
view more: next ›