this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
45 points (95.9% liked)

Selfhosted

38831 readers
110 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My home lab has a mild amount of complexity and I'd like practice some good habits about documenting it. Stuff like, what each system does, the OS, any notable software installed and, most importantly, any documentation around configuration or troubleshooting.

i.e. I have an internal SMTP relay that uses a letsencrypt SSL cert that I need to use the DNS challenge to renew. I've got the steps around that sitting in a Google Doc. I've got a couple more google docs like that.

I don't want to get super complicated but I'd like something a bit more structured than a folder full of google docs. I'd also like to pull it in-house.

Thanks

Edit: I appreciate all the feedback I've gotten on this post so far. There have been a lot of tools suggested and some great discussion about methods. This will probably be my weekend now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, whatever you end up using for documentation, print it out and actively maintain an up to date paper hard copy in a 3-ring binder somewhere. That way when all your shit falls over and you have a nonfunctional LAN you can still remember how everything was set up. Don't ask me how I know.....

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Documentation is not worth much if you can't access it when needed. So yes, either print it out or store it somewhere else what you can access even if your own hardware is completely dead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

+1 for hard copy. Hang/tape right on or next to the rack.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been using Obsidian for a lot of other purposes for a couple years now, so I was comfortable adding my documentation into my existing vault there. I made a couple templates that I fill out for any hardware/software/networking equipment.

Since the app's selling point is storing all your notes in plain text I wouldn't put anything security-related in there without some encrypted container. I use KeePass for that part, and keep the file it generates in the same folder as Obsidian so I can link to it within notes. Click the link in the note, KeePass opens the vault and asks for its password.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mind sharing your template?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure.

I left everything in, so no doubt there's stuff in there specific to my vault you won't need like metadata - adjust these to your needs or use them as a starting point for something new. There's no network device template, I usually use the hardware one and just delete the irrelevant bits.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use obsidian too. It supports mermaid too so you can make your network diagram with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the 2nd ref I've seen to mermaid. I need to check that out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Mine is, er, self-documenting, and my partner has instructions, in the event that I die, to plug the wifi router into t he the modem and unplug all the other crap.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Self documenting, eh? I may be familiar with the same process.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You just follow all the wires and read all the config files. Easy!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use WikiJS for documentation. Simple, powerful and has a lot of features

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

+1 for WikiJS. As a bonus you can have WikiJS back itself up to plain text MarkDown files, so if things explode you can always just read those from wherever.

Another great feature I use is to have WikiJS back itself up into git. If I am going to a place with no internet access I can do a quick git pull and have a complete copy of my wiki including files on my laptop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

ansible, self-documenting. My playbook.yml has a list of roles attached to each host, each host's host_vars file has details on service configuration (domains, etc). It looks like this: https://pastebin.com/6b2Lb0Mg

Additionally this role generates a markdown summary of the whole setup and inserts it into my infra's README.md.

Manually generated diagrams, odd manual maintenance procedures and other semi-related stuff get a section in the readme (you can check the template here). Ongoing problems/research goes into the infra gitea project's issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was going to recommend Ansible as well - documentation as code can never be out of date if you continue using it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For me, making a graph is the best documentation, everything else is in config files.

If I really do need to takes notes, It's currently in notion but I'm hoping soon I'll be able to self-host AnyType (https://github.com/orgs/anyproto/discussions/17)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm using netbox, and I'm in the process of info dumping my brain to a media wiki. I may add ansible into the mix in the near future.

My lab is a bit large and complex and I'm currently in the process of trying to train help to run it, from the pool of people that make use of it. They know how the front end works, a few of them need to learn the back end.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Almost nothing haha. Some half-ass notes saved here and there, in a disorganized manner.

My stuff works, but I don't recommend my approach.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is what I'm trying to get away from.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was going to say my notes are in Joplin, but my more honest answer is basically yours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Joplin has been my note-taking app of choice. Free (OSS); no accounts needed; simple; local; synchronizes through my Nextcloud instance to Linux, Windows and Android; markdown-based, etc. It's been a good workflow for me and makes taking and searching through notes quick and pretty painless.

I document my setup, backup and restoration procedures (done rarely enough that it's good to have it written down), etc. with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Joplin synced to webdav/nexcloud.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not very good at deciding on where to document things, so I have a mix of BookStack, Dokuwiki, and Obsidian currently.

I really like Dokuwiki but I like the UI/UX of BookStack better so I'm working on a plugin to sync bookstack and obsidian. I'll probably get rid of Dokuwiki after that.

The main reason for syncing with obsidian is that I want documentation that isn't stored on the thing it's about, in case my servers completely die.

In another thread, someone reminded me that TiddlyWiki still exists, it's also a pretty cool little tool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I use draw.io for diagrams. Netbox to keep track of devices, IP addresses, and cables. MediaWiki for how to articles. Both Netbox and MediaWiki live on a VM both at home and offsite and they sync nightly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm defining my service containers via GitLab and I deploy them via tagged and dockerized GitLab Runners.

If something fails, I change the runner tags for a service and it will be deployed on a different machine.

Incl case of a critical failiure, I just need to setup a Debian, install docker, load and run the GL runner image, maybe change some pipelines and rerun the deployment jobs.

Some things aren't documented well, yet. Like VPN config...

Ah yes, my router is able to access GitLab as well and pull the list of static routes etc. from it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I went with dokuwiki forever ago. Super stupid simple single container to run (no DB) and writes down to plain text files. I sync it with git every now and then.

My only gripe about it is the dokuwiki syntax and not using normal markdown. I do now have a plugin for that but it's still just ok. But at this point I might be too engrossed in it to ever really switch. But other than that it works well, is lightweight, has other plugins (email, mermaid flow charts, etc. etc.) and really is pretty maintenance-free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

DokuWiki is a name I haven't heard in a long time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Git based static site generator, like gohugo or Jekyll.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is interesting. I already just keep a collection of markdown files.. might as well make it an internal documentation site so it's easier to browse 🤔

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I use my gitea instance to backup my compose and config files. I've also enabled the Wiki on it to use for documentation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This seems pretty vanilla based on what other have suggested but I use regular markdown files in a git repo.

For data flows or diagrams, mermaidJS syntax within the markdown file works wonders and when I need to link one document to another or one section to another, you can use the normal link syntax of markdown.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I use raneto, it is a small lightweight nodejs wiki. The files are stored as markdown. I also have a script I use to write all of common configs I've modified to the wiki as code blocks in addition to my diagrams and notes.

In my case I didn't want a git based solution or a database. They get synced to my laptop via syncthing on a monthly basis as part of my container backup script.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That sounds useful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have a git repo for it, needless to say. And so README.md plus a network diagram from https://app.diagrams.net/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I run wiki.js for documentation for my home lab, but also things like the custom rom setup for my phone. However it's hard to keep it up to date as I forget it exists. I mostly use it to document setting up windows server core with different roles as I don't need to do that often, but most tutorials on the web are SEO optimised with low quality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mix of a Bookstack wiki and various git repos on my self-hosted Forgejo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Any chance you wouldn't mind sharing the SSL renewal doc? Redacted of course. Mine is coming up and I'd like to do it correctly this time. :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When I had home lab I used to use racktables - https://www.racktables.org/

but I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ibrun my own gitlab instance where i have a repository with all my configs, scripts etc.
As well as a wiki that contains the admin guide with (hopefully) all the relevant infos in form of text and PlantUML graphs.

The nice thing is.. You can just 'code' the diagrams and use a PlantUML instance to render the graphs live

load more comments
view more: next ›